RimJob the Bush worshipper is a lying hypocrite...

[Evil_Dewers]

To: Freedom Wins

So, it doesn't matter if he snorted coke as a youth? It was a long time ago, a youthful in-discretion? Kinda like people who frequented sneakeasies during prohibition? Kind of a cute story, eh? Well, how about all the people whose lives have been destroyed by being arrested for the felony of drug possession? What about the millions of people who are rotting away in your filthy drug infested prisons at this very moment?

Well, by God, if you people insist on electing another cokehead as President, you damned well better throw open all the prison cell doors and free every man, woman, and child you're holding on drug charges. And if you're gonna elect another drug felon as President, you'd better rescind each and every one of your unconstitutional drug laws now on the books, including all of your unconstitutional search and seizure laws, and your asset forfeiture laws, and your laws that enable your unconstitutional snooping into our bank accounts and cash transactions. Well, I don't know whether to laugh or cry. You people are sick! Conservatives my ass. You people are nothing but a bunch of non-thinking hypocrits! You're a shame and a disgrace to the Republic!

And, I, for one, am tired of taking orders from cokeheads and felons! Elect another one and I'll tell you what. I'll be ready for war! It'll be time to take up arms and run the filthy lying bastards out!

2 Posted on 08/20/1999 03:19:31 PDT by Jim Robinson






I wonder how RimJob feels about Limbaugh's drug problem.

[prolesunited]

1. How did you find this one?!?!

They are such lying hypocrites. Not that we "elected" Bush, but I wonder how he felt about that cokehead getting into office?

Do you think you're enlightening the Freeper trolls here or they will continue to stay in denial?

[Evil_Dewers]

9. I found it in the archives...

Here's a post referencing JimRob's cokehead post:



To: Demidog; Jim Robinson

If somebody hadn't posted since before the election, today they might get themselves in trouble if they echoed the sentiments that you posted about Dubya being a cokehead felon who shouldn't be allowed near the post of dog-catcher much less President. I assume that you'd ban yourself today if you caught yourself saying such a thing.

I agree with Jim. Bush would have made an incompetent dog catcher.

1337 posted on 6/28/02 12:58 PM Central by xxxxxxxx




Later on:


Comment #1337 Removed by Moderator

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

2. No one cares about FR anymore

Before the 2000 elections, FR was a big deal, the center of internet politics, and an honest to God phenomenon.

But when Bush won the GOP primary, and RimJob banned anyone from posting anti-Bush or pro-Buchanan or pro-McCain, and the overt hypocrisy of so-called "conservatives" electing Bush Jr, who basically represents the opposite of everything a conservative believes, the lights went out at FR.

It only worked as an opposition - FR was at its happiest when trashing Clinton and spreading nonsensical conspiracy theories about him. Now that the Republicans run the White House, Congress, the courts, and state governments, they have no one to blame but themselves, which they obviously can't and won't do.

As soon as a Democratic president wins, FR will be hopping again.

[MSchreader]

14. Foreshadowing

Before the 2000 elections, FR was a big deal, the center of internet politics, and an honest to God phenomenon.

But when Bush won the GOP primary, and RimJob banned anyone from posting anti-Bush or pro-Buchanan or pro-McCain, and the overt hypocrisy of so-called "conservatives" electing Bush Jr, who basically represents the opposite of everything a conservative believes, the lights went out at FR.

It only worked as an opposition - FR was at its happiest when trashing Clinton and spreading nonsensical conspiracy theories about him. Now that the Republicans run the White House, Congress, the courts, and state governments, they have no one to blame but themselves, which they obviously can't and won't do.

As soon as a Democratic president wins, FR will be hopping again.

This makes me wonder what might happen to DU if the Dems win in 2004. After all, this place now has a parallel position to FR's, in regards to posting anti-(insert Dem candidate's name here) or pro-(other Dem candidate's, or "third party" candidate's name) comments post-primaries.

Does DU only work "as an opposition"? Is it "at its happiest when trashing" Bush? Will the lights go out at DU if the Dems win in 2004?

Stay tuned....

Martin

[Capn Sunshine]

19. God I sincerely hope we have to confront that "problem"

[Devils Advocate NZ]

15. I wouldn't go too far down this particular path...

But when Bush won the GOP primary, and RimJob banned anyone from posting anti-Bush or pro-Buchanan or pro-McCain, and the overt hypocrisy of so-called "conservatives" electing Bush Jr, who basically represents the opposite of everything a conservative believes, the lights went out at FR.

Although I hate the freepers, I must point out one thing:

However, once the Democratic party officially nominates its candidate for president, then the time for fighting is over and the negative attacks against candidates must stop. The administrators of this website do not wish for our message board to be used as a platform to attack and tear down the only progressive on the planet with any hope of defeating George W. Bush.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/forums/rules.html

I mean isn't it a bit hypocritical to point out that FR quashed dissent against Bush when DU will do the same thing after the Dem primary? Sure FR sucks, but they don't pretend to be unbiased any more than DU does, and we shouldn't criticise them for what we do ourselves.

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

17. response to 14 & 15

Yes, I think DU is pretty much the same as FR, in fact, there are a lot of the same people (especially the libertarians).

DU shares a few things with FR - the "no bashing our candidate" rule for one, and two, special rules for Israel.

When a Democratic president wins, I think DU will have a lot less posts and regular readers. It's sort of the nature of partisan forums I think.

[eileen_d]

18. Yes, I agree

If DU participation goes down because a Democrat gets elected president in 2004 - I think it might just be worth it!

[La_Serpiente]

3. Bush was probably deprived

of a couple billion brain cells when he entered office.

[ElsewheresDaughter]

4. Betty Bowers Halfway House for the Bush Children?

[madrchsod]

6. yes-that`s where

ole` rush boy is at. how did you find out?....i wonder if betty will have something to say about ole` rush...

[eileen_d]

5. Heh - I saw this

http://www.freerepublicsucks.s5.com/crackdownmay2003.htm

If there is a fundraising scandal over in freeperville, "FR" is soon going to stand for "Free Robinson - Unjustly Jailed By Liberal Judges"

[denverbill]

8. Damn. That's funny stuff.

Funny that as often as I visit that site I never realized how bad the banning had become until last week when RimJob made the fundraising/apology post.

I can't believe RimJob actually called Bush a cokehead, and now he bans people for doing the exact same thing. What a flaming hypocrit.

[denverbill]

10. Damn. They even banned TLBSHOW. That's funny.

[prolesunited]

11. I didn't know that!

LOL!!! You gotta know things are bad when they ban a winger like him. Is he still over at capitolgrilling.com?

[Don_G]

13. TLBSHOW Is At Liberty Post Now

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/listarticles.cgi?114

[janx]

16. TBLSHOW Essay Contest

Look at this post!

TLBSHOW Essay Contest
Post Date: 2003-10-15 09:43:42 by jwgalt
2 Comments
Every year, they have an Earnest Hemingway writing contest, where participants try to pen an essay that most closely approximates his style. So, I thought LP could do the same, with our most famous abuser of the English language, the SHOW. But first, we need some guidelines to see who wins... Points could be given on... Misuse of syntax Non sequitors Run on sentences Dangling participles Incoherence Sheer passion and endurance Intent Garden variety ramblings Creation of new words ****************************************** I'll go first... So the dems that are liberals and socialistic weepy rat weepers are bushbots in disguise, which ...

_____________________________________________

[Mountainman]

7. Right wingers always implode, they can't live up to their own standards

They set the bar so high that even they can't jump over it and sooner or later it comes out.

[tom_paine]

12. And of course the Emperor*s long history of cocaine abuse

<snort>

[Paragon]

20. "sneakeasies"?

They were called "speakeasies", you retard. :eyes:

[Evil_Dewers]

21. The "n" is not close to the "p" on a QWERTY keyboard...

So obviously RimJob is a retard. No way that was a typo.

Hey maybe he's using some fancy software to convert his speech into text. Since he pulls in a quarter of a million dollars a year, he can afford the very best.

[Evil_Dewers]

22. FreeRepublic reviews on Alexa

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/reviews?q=&url=freerepublic.com

Hatred, 9/9/03
Reviewer: Abdel
Many posters on this site advocate extreme violence against Arabs, Muslims and Islam. Is this legal? Has the FBI/Law Enforcement investigated these posters? Does the Free Republic web-master condone this? Aren't there hate laws against this?

Move along; nothing to see here, 9/2/03
Reviewer: Mike
This train wreck of a web site has managed to piss almost any true conservative off by their obeisance to the Rush Limbaugh neocon philosphy and their rabid cadre of spitting neonazis who hate just about anything not associated with guns, cross tattoos,and worship of GW Bush. While true conservatives find much to dislike about the current president, I get the feeling even mentioning his opponent received more votes is grounds for banning. Unless you enjoy poking sticks at caged animals or teasing leashed dogs, avoid this site as any true conservative thought made its exit from here, as it did the Republican party, around November of 2000.


Free Republic has went into a decline, 8/31/03
Reviewer: Jimmy
A once great site that has banned most of its intelligent posters because they were unwilling to kiss Bush's tush like the other retarded bushbots on that site. Full of zionist freaks who seem to think that the purpose of America is to financially and militarily support support Israel unconditionally. The freeptards give true conservatives a bad name.

Rocco - agree with you +, 8/31/03
Reviewer: TSJ
The poster called Rocco doesn't know the half of it when it comes to the FR zionazis. I've been a registered freeper for a couple of years now, and this gang has just about ruined the place with their spew. I've been sharing freepmails with a large number of other long-time conservative freepers who are disgusted with the zionazis. Several have even told me of forwarding zionazi postings to the FBI and Secret Service due to their threatening nature. I remember in early 2002, one FR zionazi nut called for killing Colin Powell because he dared to meet with the Palestinians. If JimRob were smart he'd ban the lot of them before they drive all the decent cons away, but a former FR mod told me that they're heavy contributors, so he gives them run of the place.

The Website Free Republic is pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel., 8/31/03
Reviewer: Yonif Nachum Yehuda
The redneck Americans on Free Republic are very very jealous of the Israeli people and say many bad things about Jews and Zionism. As an American in Israel, I cannot abide this. It is abhorrent. Israel is the most important place in the world bar none. Although Israeli's make up a mere .0087% of the worlds population, the Israeli people deserve %100 of American attention and money. After all, we ARE the chosen people. Do not forget that! But the people at Free Republic have forgotten this. They keep talking about silly issues like gun-control or George Bush and such, sometimes completely forgetting to mention Israel. It is so terrible. For this reason I can only give Free Republic one Star of David. P.S. I want to give a shout out to my girls..SJackson, adam_az, and Alouette.

tin-foil hat conspiracy-minded christian fundamentalist boobs, 8/31/03
Reviewer: paul
I used to read this site but it has become a miserable collection of low-end christian fundamentalist bigots, neocon mouth-frothers and slop-browed, slack-jawed drooling idiots wallowing in a morass of mind-numbing ignorance and "we're number one!" boosterism. Lots of self-pitying stuff about not being allowed to beat up 'queers' mingled along witn incoherent ramblings about how 'moral' they all are. Sad

[Evil_Dewers]

23. More one star (out of five stars) reviews

Heil Bush !, 8/30/03
Reviewer: REPus Yma
Kameraden bei uns im Deutschen Reich da sehen wir die welt wie Ihr. Doch ne eins gibts trotzdem weil Ihr kein Deutsch könnt. Fleissig Lernen meine Kameraden, alles für den neuen Führer Bush. Heil Bu$h

Freepers are a shame for the USA, 8/30/03
Reviewer: Ex USA Fan
Review from Switzerland I check Freepers daily, its like a Zoo for me. Nazi websites are not alowed in Switzerland, and thats good. But in the USA they seem to feel really free there, they can live theyr fascism on that page. They sound like Germany in 1933, just in english and new enemys. But they dont care about what the normal ppl think, they just give them names like Leftist and DemocRATs and ugglyer. But they seem to be proud about them self, they think they represent. I hope the most ppl se that they are not the USA, they are only the blacksheeps in the USA.

Recipe for conservative indoctrination, 8/30/03
Reviewer: McNaughton
Start with 15% educated, insightful neo-conservatives. Add 85% scorners of education, home-schoolers, "everything I need to know I learned in the military", and "public education is a communist plot" anti-leftists. Add racism and bigotry to taste (lots), coat with scorn and mockery for opposing opinions, plus one lb. of religious fundamentalism (Christians only please!) Bake until all sense of proportion and empathy has evaporated. Serve with a side of ultra-nationalistic, "send-the-immigrants-back-to-Mexico!" patriots. Sample headlines from today, August 30, 2003: "Worland to allow evolution teaching" "Cruz Bustamante: Just the latest example of Democrat Racism?" "Is terror winning the war?" "Homeschoolers: Share Your Not-Back-To-School Traditions" "Nicknames of Democrat Presidential Candidates" You can be assured, if it's something liberals honestly care about, it will be reviled and attacked from high and low. For example, this excerpt from an article blaming the nation's economic woes on environmentalists (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/973298/posts): "It's interesting – and often disgusting – to listen to environmentalists squirm when they are confronted with taking responsibility for the mess they have caused. ... Until ordinary people realize that much of their economic grief is caused by the unrealistic visions of environmental extremists, we can expect the economy to further deteriorate, along with the freedom that was once the beacon of this great nation."


A seething pit of fringe rightists, ultra-orthodox superchristians and cro-mag militia types, 8/30/03
Reviewer: Mike Dennison
If you are looking for a free exchange of views, put your mouse in reverse and get as far away from this site as you possible can. Dissent is pounced upon with a viciousness and hatred usually reserved for cold war traitors and child murderers. On top of that posters who voice dissent are promptly banned from ever posting again. Most disturbing is their fanatical and nearly obsessive practice of encouraging their members to flood online polls in order to skew the results, known quaintly as "freeping". They openly encourage their marauding band of "voters" to vote multiple times, and have even devised ways of fooling or cheating safeguards that many online polls have in place to prevent such behavior. That alone betrays their ultimate dislike for democracy and their contempt and disrespect for the concept of free and fair elections. Ironic that a group of people who make a point of draping themselves in the American flag, have such a visceral disdain for the freedoms and values it represents.

[donotpassgo]

24. Ready for war???? So JimRob will finally get to scratch his

shoot a homosexual or uppity minority itch he's had? What? Is he gonna turn his brand new RV into an APC and head into the ghetto? Retrofit his wheelchair with the fully automatic weapons he's stashed away for the end times?

Why doe these sick psycho conservative fucks live in this perpetual Red Dawn reality?