Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the news is bad...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:09 AM
Original message
If the news is bad...
... just refuse to read it!


More than 1,000 LA Times subscribers cancel over recall coverage

ANDREW BRIDGES, Associated Press Writer

Friday, October 10, 2003


(10-10) 13:38 PDT LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The Los Angeles Times has gotten more than 1,000 phone complaints and a similar number of cancellations over its reports that Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger allegedly groped or humiliated women over the last three decades.

More at: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/a/2003/10/10/national1638EDT0689.DTL


(Unreal!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. One thousand. Woop-dee-doo.
The LA Times Sunday circlation is 1,396,045 in the most recent numbers I've found.

Those one thousand idiots don't really matter. And besides- the LA Times isn't even a liberal paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LAT adds that number monthly
it's a yin-yang thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. We are moving to a future where all news is judged
by it's ideological content. If a news story coincides with your personal political beliefs, you believe the story. If it doesn't coincide, it's a matter of liberal or conservative bias. The question is not whether or not a story is accurate, but whether or not it is biased.

Has anybody disputed the facts in the Schwarzenegger stories? No.

And both sides are adopting this mindset, unfortunately.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree, bryant, even as I know that I have become a little of that
Goebbels v2.0 not only programs "friendly" Brownshirts, Dittoheads and Freepers (though I repeat myself), but in the end, as Goebbels v1.0 did, also programs it's enemies/victims.

I see that you are correct in your assertion, but how to stop it? The Busheviks have shown pretty conclusively that allowing lies and bullying to go unchalleneged is to allow them to become the "conevntional wisodm" and the norm.

Can we afford any more "turning the other cheek" bending over backwards to "be fair" while the fucking Busheviks disembowel us and put an end to the Amereican Expeimrnt in exchange for Unchecked Hegemonic Power?

I don't know the answers to these questions. Are we committed to an irrevocable course that has only two outcomes: Civil War 2 or Tyrannical Bushevik Empire?

Maybe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well,
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 10:48 AM by bryant69
A couple of things to consider--the Press is not conclusively on either side. I mean some reporters lean left and many editors lean right, but other than ideologically driven papers (like the Washington Times), in theory they are trying to get things right. So if they put out a story that seems questionable--something like "Homeless think that too much fuss is made over them" than look over the sources, figure out whether there's any validity to the claim. Reporters are just as lazy as anybody else, adn are apt to take a single quote or pair of quotes or statistic and make a story out of it.

This requires a bit more work than to simply say "Well this story conflicts with what I already think so it must be wrong." But it is generally worthwhile, I think.

ANd as for your final question, I firmly believe that we are not committed to a civil war 2 or a bushevick empire--but we should all commit ourselves to working to get President Bush out of the White House and back in Crawford (or someplace else, depending).

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Accuracy is not necessarily the key
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 10:47 AM by Bandit
Back in the fifties there was a story going around about how "Soviet style" propaganda worked. It went like this. America and the Soviet Union entered into a car race and the US won the race. Soviets headlines read "Soviets come in Second while Americans come in next to last" All accurate but deffinitely a lie. What I'm saying is how a story is framed is the telling factor now a days. It's called BIAS and there is plenty on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Droit de seigneur American style
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 10:31 AM by DuctapeFatwa
Groping and other inappropriate nonconsensual behavior toward women is considered less on its merit as an action than on the basis of the relative economic and social status of aggressor and victim.

If a brown or beige low wage earner in the cafeteria of a corporation were accused by as many office level women of having groped them, it is unlikely that the local paper would lose subscribers for reporting the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC