The NH Gazette Chickenhawk database has been removed from the web

[NNN0LHI]

http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cache:4x-ic2l22DwJ:www.nhgazette.com/chickenhawks.html+chickenhawk+database&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

[MSchreader]

1. Try this link

http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=list&category=%20NEWS%3B%20Chickenhawks

Martin

[NNN0LHI]

3. Thanks. They seem to have switched things around a bit n/t

[mark0rama]

7. Like what they've done with the place!

Not only is it still online, it's been redesigned and expanded!

[LTR]

2. Another good one

http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html

[Mairead]

5. Similarly biased, however.

What's the problem with being fair and unbiased, I wonder.

[Trajan]

6. Another fair minded Democrat .....

Found face down in the mud ...

JUST where the 'bipartisan' Republicans left him ..... with boot tracks on his back ......

The time for fairness is over .....

We play to win now .... not to have one sided 'credibility' where WE are fair and kind and THEY shove our noses into the goo ......

If you arent willing to fight .. then perhaps you should step back ....

[Mairead]

4. Pity it's so partisan...the only pols they charge are GOP

It would have more credibility if they included Dems and others, too.

But perhaps getting on the case of all chickenhawks isn't really the point of the exercise.

[w4rma]

8. Repukes can do their own research, thank you.

Also, note that the site goes after folks who are want to send others into war without having been there themselves. Many Democrats have served and Many Democrats aren't hawks.

[Liberator_Rev]

12. Right on! Let them waste their time at it, too!

See my post below.

[NewYorkerfromMass]

9. The problem is the Dems are few and far between in this regard

they are outnumbered by the GOP chickenhawks quite healthily.

[Mairead]

10. Then all the more reason to be honest, no?

Trying to pretend chickenhawkery is only bad when the GOP does it guarantees 2 things: (1) chickenhawkery itself can be dismissed as unimportant and (2) Democrats can be villified as partisan liars. Why suffer that rather than get on the case of the few Dem chickenhawks too?

[Ernesto]

13. Give me a BREAK

How many democrats are signed up with PNAC? PNAC invented the G-d D-mn war. Who the hell is trying to "pretend" anything here? Get a clue, please...

[Mairead]

15. Perhaps you should spend more time thinking?

You've just responded in a completely orthogonal way.

[Ernesto]

16. BARF

Get some help soon.

[Liberator_Rev]

11. If the Democrats AS A PARTY supported a war, THEN

it would be relevant to include Democrats who avoided service themselves, while sending OTHERS to risk their asses on the front lines.

But so long as Democrats, like Bill Clinton, are saying " I don't want ANY American getting shot at, then they are simply NOT "Chickenhawks" for not wanting to go to war.

[Mairead]

14. Dear me.

I can't think when I've read a more self-exculpatory rationalisation. And you're meant to be a clergyman?