Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wired: Diebold Patched Voting Program in GA without Permission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:01 AM
Original message
Wired: Diebold Patched Voting Program in GA without Permission
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 11:02 AM by BurtWorm
Did E-Vote Firm Patch Election? By Kim Zetter
Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,60563,00.html

02:00 AM Oct. 13, 2003 PT

Diebold Election Systems has had a tumultuous year, and it doesn't look like it's getting any better.

Last January the electronic voting machine maker faced public embarrassment when voting activists revealed the company's insecure FTP server was making its software source code available for everyone to see.

Then researchers and auditors who examined code for the company's touch-screen voting system released two separate reports stating that the software was full of serious security flaws.

Now a former worker in Diebold's Georgia warehouse says the company installed patches on its machines before the state's 2002 gubernatorial election that were never certified by independent testing authorities or cleared with Georgia election officials.

If the charges are true, Diebold could be in violation of federal and state election-certification rules. The charges also raise questions about the integrity of the Georgia election results and any other election that uses patched Diebold systems that have not been re-certified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great!
more kudos to Bev Harris and company for the increasing exposure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. CMON baby ! .....
STICK ! .....

These fuckers have gotten away with their crimes SCOT FREE ! ....

When will the mainstream media AWAKE to this travesty of democracy ???? .....

Bev ? .... We love you .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Voting activist"?
I've never liked the word "activist" to identify what is really a responsible citizen action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The word activist vs advocate is very interesting.
The media tends to use activist when they wish to marginalize the activity and the word advocate when they are supportive of the action. Words are everything to the print media. They do not use them carelessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. they aren't synonymous
A "voting advocate" would presumably advocate voting itself (as in "get out the vote"), as opposed to a "watchdog" perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. What's Wonk's URL for the Media Blaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. What's Wonk's URL for the Media Blaster?
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 11:16 AM by BurtWorm
I repeat: What's Wonk's URL for the Media Blaster?

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. this is ALL about the famous "rob from georgia"
He was in charge of assembling about 20,000 machines for the election, testing them and shipping them to 159 counties. But, he said, the work was complicated by misbehaving machines that presented few clues to their problems.

"It's hard to track down a problem when you go out to your car and the first time it starts, the next time the headlights don't work, the next time you start it the brakes are out, and the next time you start it the door falls off," Behler said. "That's really the way they were."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Here's a few links from the archives.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC