Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bad news from Canada: Right-wing parties merger imminent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:49 PM
Original message
Bad news from Canada: Right-wing parties merger imminent
http://www.torontostar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1066212667289&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968793972154

<Merger talks between the Conservatives and the Canadian Alliance have made a death-bed recovery and a historic deal is imminent, sources said today. >

<The fact that lawyers have been called in to vet the agreement is of "high significance," said a Tory source, and indicates a deal is imminent. >

The right-wing movement in Canada has been broken into two parties for years, resulting in overwhelming dominance by the Liberal Party. This merger will make things competitive again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Attention Greens.
Splitting one party into two helps the opposition party. Re-merging those two parties back into one hurts the opposition party. Do you see how this applies to your situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Attension- Library_Max
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 03:59 PM by BEFOREATHOUGHT
It is another way to conform people to two choices that serve the same corporate interests, which just have different methods. It is the carrot on the stick trick, the scare tactic that the Democrats use to scare people into voting for them.

Why earn peoples votes by representing them, when you can be lazy like the Democrats and just use fuzzy math and scare tactics. See what happens when you are limited to two choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Please go to Canada and convince as many right-wingers as you can.
This is a great argument for political suicide by way of splintering your vote. Please try to talk conservatives into making themselves politically irrelevant, not liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks, for not addressing my argument
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 04:19 PM by BEFOREATHOUGHT
You just proved my cynical mind right, which is a plus for my ego, and a minus for societal and political progress. Maybe Darwin was wrong; partisans have been making this same faith based arguments generation after generation and we have little to nothing to show for it.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. It is time for sanity and courage to break the two party installed dictatorships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. just an interjection
Canadian politics is not about the US. Not everything in the world is about the US.

The party structure in Canada is not like the US -- there are five parties with significant representation in the House of Commons right now, just for starters.

You are taking one news report and exploiting one little bit of information about Canada to draw conclusions that you apply in the US. It simply doesn't work.

One news report does not a Canadian winter make. The perennial Tory-Alliance party is a fun diversion on our political scene, but it is of very little consequence; it is a death dance, on both sides. What weakened both parties involved was not the splitting of "their" vote, it was simply their very own irrelevance to a large majority of Canadians. They are not going to unite and waltz on to victory by virtue of their unity.

I find it curious and pretty annoying that just about every time some news of Canadian politics is reported at DU, it virtually immediately gets turned into an attempt to grind some axe about US politics.

The thing is that there might actually be some interesting lessons to be learned by USAmericans from observing and learning about Canadian politics, and comparing and contrasting with US politics.

But that's not what this is. This is just exploitation of a pretty meaningless "foreign" factoid to score points in some debate that the factoid has virtually nothing to do with. Really, no one appreciates having their own experience drafted into the service of someone else's arguments that they might not even agree with, and essentially misconstrued and misrepresented for that purpose. Me, I'd rather just be ignored by the south of the border throngs than used in that way.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Fair enough. My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. uh uh
What hurt the "right wing" in Canada is that it ceased to be Canadian.

The Conservative Party was historically the party of trade protectionism, cultural nationalism, and all that jazz. Then along came Prime Minister Brian Mulroney in 1984, with his corruption and Ronnie Reagan duets and slimey sucking of transnational capital interests. And a decade later, Premier Mike Harris of Ontario with his parochial tax-slashing and welfare-bashing -- which were never, never characteristic of Canadian conservatism. (Think "compassionate conservatism" and what it was *supposed* to mean, and you'll have an idea. Ontario under the previous Conservative government, in the 60s and 70s, was about what you would have expected if JFK had still been in power in the US, without the warmongering. Camelot, essentially.)

Yeah, yeah. I'm ignoring Alberta. Well, Alberta's always been Texas, the rest of us had just managed to ignore it until 20 years ago.

Mulroney and Harris smashed and doomed Canadian conservatism. The Alliance is not Canadian conservatism; it is and always will be a bunch of tinpot goosesteppers trying to crawl out of their own backwoods swamp onto the national stage, while history passes them by. The tiny pointless rump of federal Tories that remain keep trying to hitch their wagon to what they desperately perceive as the Alliance engine, and the Alliance desperately wants the Tories' respectability and old-money cachet, but nobody else actually cares.

With Liberal Prime-Minister-in-waiting Martin poised to start putting his jackboot to us, there'd actually be an opening for some of that old style Red Toryism, since Martin will do his utmost to drag the Liberals back to the right after the token baby-steps to the left Chrétien has been making. But I'm not expecting to see any new Flora MacDonalds or David MacDonalds emerging in the near future.

The guardianship of social responsibility now falls entirely in the lap of the NDP, and we can only hope that Martin gets far enough out of step with what seems to be a slight swing back toward a collective conscience among Canadians that the Liberal mask will be seen to have slipped even farther.

But the "right" -- the Tories and Alliance? Fossils. And they just can't compete with Paul Martin and his boys when it comes to being right-wing, anyhow.

Nothing at all to do with splitting the right wing, in Canada. The Tories and the Alliance just aren't the same thing -- they aren't different degrees of one thing, they're different things.

Just like our New Democratic Party, despite the popular saying, is not just "Liberals in a hurry" ... and the US Democratic party is not "the left".

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks forthis iverglas, ...I've learned a lot...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wishful thinking
They still have to ratify it in December (I suspect Conservatives will shoot it down), elect a leader, put together a platform, raise funds and whole lotta other stuff in time for a spring election.

I suspect the Liberals may lose a few seats, but not many.

The right wing movement is broken because it does not reflect the views of most Canadians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sephirstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. On the bright side...
Edited on Wed Oct-15-03 03:55 PM by Sephirstein
I'd much rather Mike Harris leading the Reich than Stephen Harper.

And I hate Harris.

On Edit:

And what the fuck? Elsie Wayne opposes this? She's the only Tory I'd vote Alliance against if it were the best way to vote her out. (She's that fucking bad.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Won't make any difference
What they're selling, Canadians ain't buying.

They are, after all, merging because they are BOTH so low in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Combined don't they approach 30% in the polls?
That isn't great and is significantly behind the Liberals but if the Liberals stumble they are within striking distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Alternate views
Trying to absorb the Alliance into the PC could mean that many PCers will flee the party (or just not vote) when confronted with the Alliance's far-right drivel.

Or the Alliance might find itself unable to get its more extreme views into party platforms.

This is really just an admission by the Alliance that they've become irrelevant in national politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The Alliance scares the sh*t out of me.
And I live in Edmonton, the Canadian hot-spot of conservatism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Actually, that's Calgary
Edmonton's a bit looser in the loafers (or whatever the expression is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Canadians, prepare for Anschluss
It is not a uestion of "if".

If the Busheviks remain in charge of Imperial Amerika, it is "when".

Don't say nobody warned you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC