|
Moveon.org is trying to get 100,000 phone calls, emails, or faxes sent to Congress by the end of this week urging a no vote on the $87 billion. I sent this fax to my senators and representatives.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Senator Charles Schumer Senator Hillary Clinton Representative Nina Lowey
Dear Legislators:
A little over a year ago I wrote to you urging you to vote no on the Iraq War Resolution. It was obvious to me then that President Bush could not be trusted with unfettered power to use the military as he wished. You didn’t agree with me then; perhaps you do now.
Now I am urging you to vote no on the appropriation of $87 billion for Iraq.
I understand that the troops in Iraq need support. And there is no denying that we have a responsibility to the Iraqi people to help them get their country functioning again. Money will have to be spent. But the Bush Administration cannot be trusted with that money. The White House is not soliciting the $87 million to support the troops or to help Iraq. That outrageously padded budget is part of the biggest money-laundering scheme in American history.
You want to follow the money? Here it goes -- from our pockets as taxpayers into the pockets of war profiteers like Halliburton, which will cycle a good part of the profit back to the Bush re-"election" effort and the GOP. No wonder the budget is padded — the more padding, the more money will end up in Bush’s 2004 war chest.
Senator John Edwards is right — the White House must be cut off. Congress must assume control, not just attempt oversight. The Constitution clearly gives the power of the purse, including control of all military spending, to Congress. And I understand that in past wars and post-war programs, including the Marshall Plan, the President and Congress worked closely together to budget, appropriate, and distribute money. President Truman did not just accept congressional oversight to keep the spending; he insisted on it.
But Bush doesn't want to have to work with Congress, or the UN, or anyone else. He wants what he wants, and Congress is supposed to be a big rubber stamp. Bush must be forcefully told that he has no power under our Constitution to demand that Congress approves his spending plans without condition. A no vote on the $87 billion appropriation would serve notice.
Sincerely, Barbara O’Brien
|