Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Schumer on NOW - C-Span 2 on Plame outing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:11 PM
Original message
Sen. Schumer on NOW - C-Span 2 on Plame outing
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 01:11 PM by steviet_2003
www.cspan.org

on edit, spelin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Details?
It's good to hear Chuck won't let this die....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seems to be a very real conflict of interest
for A$hcroft to investigate Rove. Calling for a special council.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. appears to be calling for special counsel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoKingGeorge Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Henry Waxman and Condi
Don't be so sure. Others have let things die. Did Henry Waxman ever get an answer from the head of NSC (condi rice) about evidence of WMD???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is great.
Dems are using this money as a chance to really stick it to the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. says Ashcroft and Justice have conflict of interest
No one believes there is any independence in the investigation.

Pleas for special counsel have been ignored.

Guilty parties should be punished for despicable act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. "you don't give guilty parties advance notice, giving them...
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 01:32 PM by syrinx9999
... a chance to destroy evidence."

"Something is wrong? Is it done nefariously? I don't know... But it doesn't make a bit of difference."

"What is going on here, Mr. President? Scott McClellan is conducting this investigation? Clearly Mr. President, a media spokesman doesn't have the legal expertise..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Chuck thinks the investigation is a fraud
He knocked junior and Ashcroft and indirectly called them a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Reno tried Clinton 7 times Aschcroft has tried Bush's O
And nobody outed a CIA agent either in Clintons administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. bringing up Bush Sr's quote
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 01:28 PM by Monica_L
the most insidious of traitors. Serious stuff. Not in the words of some "partisan democrat" but the words of a republican and this president's father!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. ramifications for CIA morale
when you know your own country can identify you. They will be reluctant to serve when they feel their information can be leaked.

At the very minimum we need a special counsel. Ashcroft should recuse himself immediately. Handling of this case as if they didn't know how, didn't care or is afraid.

I say to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle "this isn't going to go away."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. "How can you have an ivestigation, if you don't know who's in charge"
The President says we may never get to the bottom of this matter. Maybe that's what he thinks, maybe that's what he hopes.

If this had happened during the Clinton administration, what would have happened would have made our reaction look like pabulum, compared to what would have come from the other side.

This was a serious, serious crime.

Serious stuff. Traitors. And here we are looking at an investigation that makes one scratch one's head in wonder.

It is obvious that at a very minimum we need a special counsel. At a very minimum, Ashcroft should recuse himself immediately.

To my friends on the other side of the aisle: This isn't going away!

Appoint a special counsel of high integrity and see where it leads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sen Harkin
I don't think the president wants to get to the bottom of this. He is remarkably nonchalant, he even jokes with foreign reporters about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Schumer
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 01:41 PM by Monica_L
Joking and banter bothers me. Pres has made it a point that we have to do everything we can to support troops. No matter what your view of war, has made it a hallmark to do everything we can to support them. And yet when it comes to defending an agent on the front lines and has been betrayed by a traitor, we get nonchalance, a joke here and there, excuses, this wasn't an agent but an analyst, this wasn't done by malice and that it isn't serious. The president could demand that the culprit turn him or herself in, but I haven't heard that yet. There's a dichotomy and that is that for this betrayal of a soldier if you will, who has been on our front lines, there is an attitude "who cares too much about this?"

If pres were certain in his belief we have to get to the bottom of this we wouldn't see the behavior we've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoKingGeorge Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. correction >>>> TWO TRAITORS nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. O-o-o-o-h, I didn't realize
the pres* joked about it with foreign journalists! And the Repubs are angry at the Dixie Chicks and others who speak out against his policies when they're abroad?

Hmmm - if I could draw cartoons, I'd start a comic strip called "The Daily Hypocrit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Harkin says he's not sure the pres* wants to get to the bottom...
of the leak. Go Tom! He pointed out how the president has joked about the issue. Now Schumer reiterates the joking and said how bothered he is about the pres* "bantering about it".

Get it it in the record, guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheesehead Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is REALLY good stuff!
There are a whole bunch of newly-chewed assholes at the White House!

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Been reported in the media
those who know intelligence know that the greatest danger may not have been to the agent or group of contacts but rather to morale of intel agency. If agents know they can be outed becuz they say something admin. disapproves of, that is the danger. The CIA is furious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Harkin and Schumer teamed up
Schumer yielding the floor for softball questions from Harkin.

won't this hamper the entire intel community?

why the delay at the white house??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Puke Stevens makes me sick
asking why this issue is germain to debate on 87B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Schumer : ammendment utterly germane
Valerie Plame just as much a soldier in War On Terra, quite germane, more germane that others. Hasn't there been an agreement to allow non-germane ammendments?

Stevens (R): This matter now in counterintelligence in DOJ. Decades of experience. Has a connotation of lack of confidence in DOJ. (no shit) They're following standard procedures in handling this matter and they feel both CIA and counterintel, no need for a special counsel. Not sought by professionals in this area.

Schumer: We have no knowledge if counterintel solely in charge. Have to report to DOJ or FBI? Are they countermanded in where they go. We know none of that. The problem special counsel is needed, we don't know who's in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Stevens...
What is unique about this situation? Oh, brother - doesn't he know citizens are watching? Go on there, Schumer - explain it to the esteemed nitwit from Alaska.

Now he's going to block it? Is that what just happened? Did Schumer blow it or is it that the amendemnt is not appropriate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. I have a question re Mr. Stevens, please...
given the seriousness of the topic of the treason, why is this babbling idiot, Stevens, the only repub speaking for the repubs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. He is the manager for the $87B spending bill
so he is running this session. Schumer has the floor to present his amendment to that bill. i guess SOP and parlimentary rules say they are the only ones who get to talk unless schumer yields for a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thank you!
Being Canadian, I was unsure of the process. Thank you for explaining it, I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Schumer must have proposed an amentment to the spending bill
calling for a spec. investigator. Stevens continues to say it is not germain. Schumer defending, $600 mil for continued WMD search, need to know the analysis will be good, Plame was an expert on WMDs.

Steven saying the professionals in the counterintel at DoJ are working on it, Schumer counters that they still answer to a$hcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Stevens: In the hands of people trained to discover such leaks
Schumer: On an area like this, not just typical leak, none have involved the revealing of name of an agent. Crime in itself. Bottom line is very simple, this is so important that we can't leave this to conjecture. Counterintel gerneaally does good job so they'll do one here. I think this is too important to leave to supposition. THis is a matter of great importance. I would hope my colleague would allow us to vote on this ammendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. Schumer: no of times agent's name leaked
and not by somebody on other side but high administration official, quite different than most of the leaks we've had. Ask lay aside pending ammendments and ask consent that ammendment be considered.

Stevens - not letting him do it. Point of order not debatable. I share umbrage at process will do everything to get to the bottom. May become a time when spec. pros is needed, not now.

SHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. F**king Stevens killed it!!!
asswipe. point of order that the amendment is not germain, pres of senate agreed, issue dead.

i imagine schumer knew all along that would happen but wanted to at least get his 2 cents worth in.

kinda sad when we have no other way to get the word into the minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Point not debatable
Ammendment falls.

Now talking about Byrd ammendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. and the chair was seemed so smirky about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. who the hell is that chair??
I've just been trying to look it up. Seems like he has alot of power for a non-elected official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It's a senator, isn't it?
I thought the chair is always a member of the majority party.

And to think - when I went to elementary school, civics was a separate lesson! I'm ashamed not to know all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Yeah, me too
On the senate web site it lists cheney as president of the senate and Stevens as President pro-tem, this must be someone speaking for Cheney I guess. No wonder he so quickly agreed to kill Schumer's amendment on a special prosecutor.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. Byrd
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 02:16 PM by Monica_L
If US ever to work successfully with int'l community the WH must take real steps to share power with UN.

THe Byrd/Kennedy/Leahy ammendment require pres to report to Congress and plan to support American troops by bringing them home before $$ can be spent.

IF president's efforts have paid of in UN contributions, oversight how to get the UN in and the US out of Iraq. We need to have congress watch people's money and get troops the help they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. Motion to table Byrd ammendment
by Stevens. Doing roll call now.

Pukes will table it no doubt. We don't need no steenking oversight!!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I've been listening all day
The byrd bill makes too much sense for the pukes, no doubt!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. And I like the Kucinich language
U.S. out - U.N. in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
40. 57-42 to table Byrd Ammendment
Now discussing tabling Lautenberg ammendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. Lautenberg
to correct situation about VP Cheney's statement on MTP. Re: links to Halliburton, had no-bid contract and has billed US $1.4 billion so far. Halliburton has other contracts, oil contract was not (voted on?)

Deferred compensation and stock options are financial stake in Halliburton. At top of executive branch should have divested. Attach ethical guidelines to Iraq reconstruction. Send message that no one can influence policy and profit from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Graham (R)
Vote how you like, join sides with dems in a minute. This ammendment is political slander. Factually incorrect. He was exempt from going to office of gov't ethics. Went above and beyond. Accusing him of being a liar. Politics at its worst. VP doesn't deserve this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. GRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We HAVE to get the senate back at least in 2004!! The byrd amendment was great. This one is good too but it's gonna gets tabled along partisan lines too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Graham was practically screeching
about how the oh-so-honorable big Dick Cheney is being slandered by this ammendment. Why is everything slander to them? Methinks he doth protest too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
44. This ammendment
prohibits giving contracts to companies that pay compensation to senior administration officials.

Looks like it'll be tabled along party lines. So much for avoiding even the hint of scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
46. Please use the Senate Watch thread
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 02:59 PM by goobergunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Your link failed
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. fixed (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Vote is going along party lines so far
I haven't heard Lieberman's name called in either roll call. Is he absent, abstaining or hiding somewhere today when we desperately need his vote for the home team?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
49. 65-34 to table
This sux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. Dodd on Help America Vote Act
Not making much sense so far.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
52. Repukes want unlimited time
Stevens shutting down Reid. Wants all repuke ammendments read without time limits because dems had ONE w/o limits. Dirty tricks.

Reid saying this bill will not be done by tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC