What a week! We've had some really good news, with stories breaking on 60 Minutes II and Nightline, regarding White House lies. Bush was slapped a bit in Congress, with the vote to turn part of the money he wanted for Iraq into a loan, and this, despite his vigorous opposition. There were stories about how he's now alienating many in his own party with his arrogant behavior, and Ted Kennedy stood on the floor of the Senate screaming, "Lies, lies, lies!!" At the U.N., members approved a new U.S. sponsored Iraq resolution, but then announced afterwards that it meant little or nothing, and they were still not going to contribute troops, nor substantial sums of money. In reality, it was a loss for Bush, though White House tried to spin it otherwise.
Not a bad week (I'll leave out the fact that all but a handful of Dems voted to give Bush his $87B for Iraq, further helping him).
But, while all this was going on, a very ominous story about North Korea popped up. An AP story indicated that North Korea plans to set off a nuclear device, in an effort to, ".... open its nuclear deterrent to the public as a physical force."
While N.K. has spouted off with much sabre rattling in the past, the article seemed to indicate more concern on the part of U.S. officials than in the past. It also appears, that the U.S. is ready to concede that N.K. probably does have two or more nuclear devices, that they did indeed process the fuel rods they had into bomb-grade nuclear material, and that N.K. has in fact, joined the nuclear "club".
Article link:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/10/16/international1231EDT0637.DTL&type=printable What concerns me, is that I wonder if while our attention is diverted with events in the Middle East, the REAL story is happening in North Korea? North Korea could provide Bush with a "real" opportunity to put the country on a war footing, and because of the seriousness of the matter (now enhanced by N.K.'s nuclear bombs), and the threat to our close allies in the region (S. Korea and Japan), if events there were to quickly sour, Bush would once again become a war-time "Commander In Chief", .... just in time for the elections.
If the U.S. does indeed engage N. Korea in battle, even with something as "simple" as bombing their nuclear facilities, it could put the nation on a real emotional roller coaster. We would see the newspaper again decline to print any adverse articles about the "war-time COC", support for all things military would skyrocket again, and critics of the administration would either find themselves silenced, or censored.
All of this would be made worse of course, if it were learned, for instance, that North Korea had nuclear missles capable of hitting the West Coast of the United States. And I suppose whether they did, or did not, the Bush administration would *say* they did (WMD's anyone?), just to scare the country shitless, and engender a Goebbels-style propaganda fest on the part of Rove and PNAC.
Anyway, from this perspective, I think the real "story of the week" may have been in North Korea. What if BushCo knows that a North Korea action could put the administration back in the "9/11 saddle", silence their Iraq war critics, provide another "trifecta", and help with Bush's re-election? Does anyone think they might actually try (behind the scenes?) to "encourage" further N. Korean bellicosity, perhaps leading to military maneuvers?
Fact is, I wouldn't put anything past Bush and his neocon cabal. If they felt that a North Korean war might be the only thing to save their fascist butts in 04', I have no doubt they would try to "encourage" such a war. Do you feel this may be a bit of "tin foil hat", or do you think it's plausible?
As a person who is firmly convinced the BFEE planned and executed (in conspiracy with the Saudi and Pakistani secret services), the events of 9/11, perhaps I'm not the best one to judge. Having said that, something tells me things are cooking over N. Korea, and with U.S. spy planes crossing the country daily now, anything could happen.
:scared: