An Argument for Clark.

[poskonig]

We've all heard the standard arguments why Clark is the "best" candidate. Clark polls the best head-to-head against Bush right now. Clark has foreign policy credentials. Clark will somehow make us competitive in the south. Given the dynamic and strategic nature of a political campaign itself, many believe other factors, like campaign experience, fundraising, organization, personality, and message clarity will eventually play more important roles.

But there is at least one scenario where Clark is hands down the best candidate.

When things are going poorly, sharp contrasts and an outsider message generally works well. Suppose the economy turns around, and Bush gets Iraq stabilized. This changes the requirements for winning, particularly in the message department. If Iraq is off the table, North Korea, Iran, and al-queda once again become the central foreign policy issue. Secondly, having a sound record of economic stewardship is less important in an election where things are doing well. Hence if things are looking bright in the summer of 2004, Clark would be a outright better choice, than let us say, Dean or Kerry.

If things are still in the shitter economically and/or with foreign policy in 2004, the jury is still out as to who the better candidate is, myself arguing for an aggressive Dean in such a situation.

[Kahuna]

1. Excellent points!

I knew you had it in you! :7

[billbuckhead]

2. Since Clark is a southerner, that's how he will make us competitive

Dean's a non starter in the south. Wait till Vermonter Dean starts talking about race in the south. There's more Asians in Atlanta than all minorities in Vermont. He has no credibility on this issue.
Even though he has whored for an "A" rating from the NRA, Dean still won't be endorsed by the the gun lovers.
He will easily be demonized by the Ralph Reed fundie brigades as the "gay marriage" guy. At the end of the day, Dean is the candidate of the more than a college degree crowd, a group we will carry easily with any candidate. Wes gives us chance with middle class white men, the Swartzeneggar type voters who are looking for someone larger than life.

[Kahuna]

3. Wes is more attractive across demographics and regions...

Even thought people don't know much about Clark, I believe they find his attractive appearance and calm and thoughtful demeanor very appealing. He looks, acts and sounds presidential. He's from Hollywood casting. Unfortunately, shallow Americans prefer style over substance. Witness the 2000 election.

We Clarkies jumped for joy when we discovered General Clark. Clark embodies for us both style AND substance.

[Bread and Circus]

4. Wow!