Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean supporters - Judicial Watch goes on the attack against your guy!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:44 PM
Original message
Dean supporters - Judicial Watch goes on the attack against your guy!
Edited on Mon Oct-20-03 06:46 PM by Democat
Why is Judicial Watch still a non-profit organization where contributions are tax deductible?

Maybe the Dean Army needs to find a way to have Judicial Watch stripped of their tax exempt status? Klayman is running as a Republican - how can they possibly claim to be non-partisan?

If they were a left wing political organization that was tax exempt, the right wing would have had them stripped of tax status long ago. Are People For The American Way tax exempt? No, because the government says they are partisan. Why is Judicial Watch allowed to be called "non-partisan"?

Is it time for our side to start fighting or not?

http://www.judicialwatch.org/3518.shtml

DEAN’S “AMBITION” CITED AS REASON FOR GUBERNATORIAL RECORDS SEAL

Dean’s Seal Request Termed “Extreme” By Vermont Deputy Secretary of State

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that Vermont State archivist documents concerning the negotiations and decision to seal former Vermont Governor and Democratic Presidential candidate Howard Dean’s records show Dean’s personal political ambitions for the presidency were the reason Dean wanted his gubernatorial records sealed for an unprecedented 24 years. Ultimately, they were sealed for 10 years. Vermont State Archivist Gregory Sanford specifically cited “ambition” as not being sufficient grounds for exempting records from disclosure. Vermont Deputy Secretary of State William A. Dalton stated in a September 4, 2002 e-mail that, with respect to Dean’s request, “. . . even eight years seems extreme.”


Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and corporations and are tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jonte_1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Their track record is on par with Lionel Hutz's
I'm shaking in my boots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But why does the left allow them to get away with it?
If Judicial Watch was a left wing organization, the right wing would have had them stripped of their tax status years ago.

Why does the left roll over when the right would fight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Larry Klayman is a lawsuit junkie
He sues over some pretty trivial things. He did file a suit against Cheney to release the Energy Task Force documents. Not much came of that I am sorry to say.

As person who believes in a transparent government, I wonder why Dean went to court to have his gubernatorial records sealed.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Many gov's seal their records, the issue is quite boring actually..
http://publicbroadcasting.net/vpr/news/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=441887

"Well, there are future political considerations. We didn't want anything embarrassing appearing in the papers at a critical time in any future endeavor." ~ Howard Dean said jokingly.

However sealing records is nothing unusual,

"With our limited experience with executive privilege records, there doesn't appear to be anything that is of embarrassment, if that is a criteria. My understanding in negotiating with several recent administrations now, is that it's a desire protect the decision making process, the free flow of ideas within an administration."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Did Clinton seal his papers?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Point?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. gully claimed it's normal for governors, Clinton was a gov.
Did Clinton seal his papers?

Why that point needed clarification for you will remain a mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Larry Klayman would sue his own mom
and he actually did. See below:

<snip>

Adversaries have described Larry Klayman as the sort of guy who would sue his mother. Turns out, he's the kind of guy who would sue his mother and take the case to trial.

The chairman of Judicial Watch, a crusading conservative with a yen for hardball and a knack for peppering Clintonites with litigation, now has Mom in his sights. Barring a last-minute settlement, Klayman's lawsuit against the seventysomething lady who brought him into this world goes to trial today in D.C. Superior Court.

<snip>

http://www.politicalamazon.com/klaymanmom.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Larry Klayman sued his own Mother
to get her to pay his Dad's medical bills. What a scumbag.:spank: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this the group that went after Cheney?
Just a question. I think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. They also are still attacking Clinton on Monica....
http://www.judicialwatch.org/

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/10/124511

Looking at their headlines, it's obvious they are a RW propaganda site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. To prevent cherry picking
Dean had the records sealed to prevent cherry picking by Rove. He did not want to be Willie Hortoned.

There is no way that anyone with a record as long as Dean's hasn't written a thing or two in the past, which when taken completely out of context, would be embarrasing or unfortunate.

There is no doubt that the repugs will investigate any Dem candidate at length (think Clinton here) to find ammo for the fall campaign.

What he signed into law, wrote, or spoke publicly remain in the public domain for inspection and comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. They've been going after Bush, Cheney & Co. lately
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. They're representingTerri Schiavo & postal workers vs. govt (anthrax)
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Will they attack Bush's "ambition" for sealing Poppy & Ronnie's records?
Somehow they seem to have overlooked that little episode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's long overdue for activists to sue Krazy Larry
... for abusing the litigation process. A couple good lawyers and well-written claims (and counterclaims to Judicial Wretch lawsuits) could do the trick quite nicely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC