Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush "wins" in 2004, it will most likely be because...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:01 PM
Original message
Poll question: If Bush "wins" in 2004, it will most likely be because...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats pulling our own candidates down.
Ah, the self defeating democrat. it is aan unpredictable animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree.
We Dems seem to do a good job of beating each other up before we run against some repug. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeePlease1947 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. I agree too, or this happens
The Democrats nominate someone that cannot win.


Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. The only way a Dem "could not win" would be if the Dem allows
the Bushists to control the coverage of the election--in other words, not through some fault of the candidate, per se, except for a willingness to take what the Bushists dish out.

You may be thinking that the Bushists will manipulate the Dems, through sabotage of viable candidacies as the Nixonists managed, into picking someone they can easily portray as an effete lefty. That, I suppose is a possibility. But if you have in mind a particular candidate who is legitimately in the running for the nomination as being unelectable, I'm skeptical. I think there are at least four Democratic candidates who stand a good shot at removing Bush's boily ass from the White House. My main fear is that whoever the nominee is will allow himself (no Braun is not on the list, sorry) to be defined by the Bushists and their lapdogs in the media. Dean will be portrayed as a hotheaded, draft-dodging lefty from Ben and Jerryville. Kerry will be portrayed as a cold-blooded, lying aristocrat. Clark will be portrayed as a shapeshifter. The election will become about Dean's or Kerry's or Clark's or Gephardt's or whoever's character. (Sorry, Kucinich, Braun, Sharpton and Edwards supporters, but I don't see any of them catching fire.) (Oh, and Lieberman, too.) That is, it will become about character if the Democratic nominee hasn't learned from Al Gore's mistakes and forgets to fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm really surprised no one has picked number two.
Edited on Mon Oct-20-03 11:06 PM by BurtWorm
That's the easiest, most likely scenario as far as I can tell. They've already started working on the ones they're most afraid of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Other-DUers and "Democrats" refuse to get active and GTV...n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That is a possibility, but probably only if one of the other
Edited on Mon Oct-20-03 11:13 PM by BurtWorm
conditions above is met. There would seem to have to be a reason for voters not to vote this piece of shit administration out. Demoralization would have to result from something. In my opinion, the most likely something is that Rove picks up where other Dem candidates leave off and makes everyone completely sick of the Dem nominee. Sick enough not to vote or to vote for a spolier or loser third party candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think that
he could win if they stage another terra-ist incident and manipulate the votes.

Given what he did the first time, this seems almost like a "done deal." Treachery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. combination of 3 elements
1) republican control of the media ... remember what happened to Gore: he had no skeletons in his closet, so the media constantly smeared him as a 'serial liar' ... and the passes given to the republicans (Bush, Arnold, etc.)

2) republican control of the voting ... BBV, intimidation of minorities (see reports from 2000 and 2002), 'foul up' with ballots (2000 and 2002), disenfranchisement of minority voters, etc, etc, etc,

3) less important, but a contributing factor...democrats who tear down democrats and democrats who refuse to vote for the democratic nominee because he/she does not meet their self-righteous standards of 'purity'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I would have voted "all of the above", but I don't believe the economy....
...will actually recover. They will try to sell that bullshit, just as they already are, but jobs in India and more profits for Billionaires is NOT an economic recovery and anybody reporting it as such should be on trial for treason along with the BCE themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I agree
I don't know how they keep track of the economy, but if a lot of Americans are out of work, out of money and losing their health insurance, it is not a recovery. I think this is a lot harder to hide than lies about the war and stuff. Almost everyone knows someone who has been laid off and unable to find work. My husband has been out of work for quite a while and it's very depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. pink tutu dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Diebold Republican Electing Machinez
what else do they need?

If they can't fix the election, then look for a :nuke: allegedly from North Korea
then martial law, a general mobilization, and no more elections.

(WHY do you think they blew Plame and her group -- precisely the ones most likely to discover and expose such a plot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shigley Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. Not even the righties would go for that
Martial law? There's no way that could be enforced - too many soldiers would tell the guy giving that order to screw(are we allowed profanity on here?) themselves, and too many people have guns for the rest to succeed. Wouldn't it be strange to be allied with the NRA though? :wow: Oh well, as long as we go back to hating them when it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iangb Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Because the great and necessary tasks .......
....facing Americans, of fighting terrorism and Rogue nations need to be continued without interruption, using the Emergency Powers vested in me by Congress I have decreed that the elections for President of the United States due in November have been cancelled."


........or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. That would spark armed resistance. No question.
Martial law and suspending/cancelling elections?

That'd start a revolution, my friend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
32. Don't kid yourself...
Martial law and suspending/cancelling elections?
That'd start a revolution, my friend.


A civil war perhaps between "patriotic" Americans who support the pResident and those who don't, but how many folks will think about the real causes for their problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iangb Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. Revolution?
With the popular media portraying your heroic Presidents sacrifices for his country, and the dangers posed by 'liberal traitors' I reckon most Americans would accept a canceled election as the lesser of two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:49 AM
Original message
I got an "already voted" message on this poll.
Is there one of those embedded programs in here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. Didn't happen to me... I think they fixed that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. I got an "already voted" message on this poll.
Is there one of those embedded programs in here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Maybe you voted twice without knowing it?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. Other...
In a repeat of 2000, the "Liberal" media will spend the entire year proclaiming Bush, the moderate, invincible until the day before the election when they'll report a "surge" for the Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. He got to run against Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. I picked cheating.
I'm more confident than ever that we're going to win this thing, but ONLY if it's a fair election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shigley Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Not necessarily
Never underestimate the ignorance of those who don't know the political world. And the electoral vote could screw us again like it did last time. Why is that system still around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Certain European leaders seem to gamble the Bush's "re"-election
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 04:49 AM by BonjourUSA
with a simple cynicism.

If this asshole is re-elected the economical and political move of the world will get speed toward an US weakening. For example, the euro would little by little remplace the dollar and the world would stop de facto to pay the US deficit.

But this scenario could be catastrophic for the world economy, but I think the creation of the Russia, Germany and France axis is founded on this bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Putin's ambitions towards Europe depend on having the
Neo-cons and christian fundies ruling the US for the foreseable
future.

Putin would much prefer a Russia/EU pole than a Russia/China aliance.
He would have to turn to China if a Democrat would
re-establish the normality in US/EU relations.

China on the contrary would very much like to get rid of Bush so
that Russia would have to come to them loking for an ally and for
many other reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onebigbadwulf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Other...
Repuke's monopoly on the media.


Welcome to nazi germany ladies and gentlemen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. BonjourUSA, how are the French media reporting Putin's flirtation
with moving toward petroeuros?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonjourUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. No comment
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 10:23 AM by BonjourUSA
No very clear idea seems to predominate in the French media which report the fact without real comment

Only a repetitious question : where would Putin like to get his money ?

We have to recall that Russia has always been afraid with the theory of surrounding. And now the USA are too close from its pipes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Well, what do you think of the idea?
Isn't Europe kind of excited about the prospect of knocking the dollar off its pedestal, and wouldn't Putin's switch advance that goal tremendously? Or are Europeans afraid of what it might really mean to have their currency become the world's currency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErasureAcer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
23. Other: The Dem candidate sucking
so support Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. Chimpy will personally find Saddam, Osama, the anthrax killer, and
the person who killed Shondra Levy.

He'll accomplish all of this in October 2004, right before Reagan and/or Barbara Bush drops dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Considering the lengths to which they went to put Bush in the White House
this crowd is not going to just pack up and leave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xJlM Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
28. He cheats
He can't win on any of the lies he ran on in 2000, and he sure can't run on his record. The economy is not going to get noticably better in the next year or so, in fact it may get noticably worse. Don't worry, though. Those clever dogs running the PNAC have a plan and a back up plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. The Rove Spin, dirty tricks, lies will be the most deadly.
Rove is the mastermind in the politcal strategy of this administration in the 2004 election.

He is like a general giving out orders to the troops that dutifuly and blindly follow them to the letter.

Make no mistake, its the Dems vs RoVe in 2004, Bush is just a figure head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
36. I'm still shocked we were allowed 2
vote in 11/02. But I C 11/02, more and more, was a dry run 4 corrupting the voting mascreens next year. They were successful in the tight races and NO ONE questioned the results. The recount has been eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. I can't even think about bush actually getting elected
I fear for this country and the rest of the world if this bunch of terrorists get back in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. won't rely on one thing
All the dirty stuff, the flash and money deluge, the media spin, the sabotaging of the Democratic campaign, the diversion- on a broad determined and probably simple scale.

The more important question is what the Dems will do, will they do it united and with enough backing and dough, and will they elect more than a President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC