Kennedy, other critics, are ‘traitors’

[bbernardini]

At least according to this fool:

http://www.dailylocal.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10350505&BRD=1671&PAG=461&dept_id=17785&rfi=6

Might I suggest you make liberal use of the "Post Your Opinion" option at the bottom of the page? :)

A brief sample:

According to my dictionary a "traitor" is a person who behaves disloyally; one who betrays his country. What I hear from U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., is nothing short of traitorous. The nine (10?) would-be candidates for the presidency in 2004 are but a short distance behind him with their ranting and raving and irresponsible blaspheming of the president of the United States.

[Q]

1. Is 'disloyalty' to a president the same as disloyalty to country?

- RWing pundits want YOU to believe that Bush* and the US are one in the same. That is...disagreeing with Bush* means you're 'disloyal' to America. Don't fall for this shit.

[w13rd0]

2. How doth one...

..."blaspheme" a President? A mighty lofty perch this dumbass has put Dubya on...

[ET Awful]

3. I was thinking the same thing . . .

How exactly do you "blaspheme" a pResident?

According to my dictionary blaspheme means to speak of (God or a sacred entity) in an irreverent, impious manner.

I think this author needs a new dictionary :)

[zonmoy]

37. Simple

they think that any republican being in actuallity a christian theocratic party speaks for god.

[RebelOne]

4. I gave that idiot my 2 cents worth.

[liberalmuse]

5. So did I

What a load of tripe. I also pointed out his inappropriate use of the word, 'blaspheme'.

[Brucey]

21. I replied too.

I bet they're getting a ton of negative responses to the letter.

[JNelson6563]

6. Daddy Bush disagrees

and I noted that to this fool.

Awarding Kennedy that award is an eternal embarrassment to Jr andhis pals. LOL!!


Julie

[peekaloo]

12. HA! Poopy is givin' aid and comfort to the enemy!

:o

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2003/10/18/bush_srs_message_to_bush_jr/

[WilliamPitt]

7. "Blaspheming"?

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

8. Yes. Blaspheme.

[Bozita]

10. "Blaspheme" fits in light of this photo

Thanks.

[jobycom]

11. I told you!

If he tries to think too hard, his head catches fire! Visual proof!

[gratuitous]

14. I thought that was a visual representation

Of the Light of Sweet Reason bouncing off Chimpy's thick melon, impervious.

[Classical_Liberal]

9. The neocon war hawks are projecting again

. Remembe Valerie Plame.

[Iverson]

13. feedback invisible

I gather that several of us have responded, but I don't see any reader responses. Any suggestions, crew?

[bbernardini]

22. It usually takes a while to update...

I suspect the system is set to update automatically at periodic intervals, or the updates are done by hand. The comments on other articles (on many topics) have been from both sides, so if it's done by hand, the person is neutral.

[Lindacooks]

15. But it was okay

to call President Clinton a murderer?

Repukes' hypocrisy is getting worse and worse.

[hackwriter]

16. I just did

I'm the first, too! Go read it. I think I nailed this f***er to the wall. ;)

[NNN0LHI]

17. This guys name is Harlan "BUCK" Ross. Whats that tell you? n/t

[Iverson]

18. Resist stereotyping.

Too many of us on the left have a habit of alienating potential allies.

[Bozita]

19. Tempting though, you gotta admit.

[Bridget Burke]

20. It tells me he signed his name, Mr. NNN0LH1!

Obviously, he's an idiot.

But I learned that by reading his letter, not by pre-judging him because of his name.

[Media_Lies_Daily]

23. My response, and I hope they print it...

"Here's what I think are the true definitions of the term "traitorous". "Traitorous" is when you subvert the political process and seize power by means other than the electoral process. "Traitorous" is when you allow an event like 911 to happen to further your own political/military agenda. "Traitorous" is when you lie about the reasons for going to war and then allow men to die in that war while planning new wars. "Traitorous" is when you shift the country's tax burdens to the poor and middle class to make your powerful friends even more fabulously wealthy. "Traitorous" is when your grandfather helped make loans to the Nazis from 1926-1942 that were used to build Auschwitz. "Traitorous" is when your father makes a speech at a Washington Times Founders Day in effusive praise of Rev. Moon of South Korea. I guess being "traitorous" runs in a certain family, but that family is NOT the Kennedys."

[nini]

38. Excellent!

:-)

[Media_Lies_Daily]

39. Thanks! But I doubt seriously they'll post my remarks.

[bbernardini]

24. Keep up the comments!

Even though they haven't been posted yet, I want the repug fools who check out the comments all the time to be overwhelmed. :)

[bbernardini]

25. COMMENTS ARE UP!

Keep them coming!

[Iverson]

26. fourteen responses so far

100% are critical of the writer, but I wonder whether we can muster any more.

[bbernardini]

28. Of course!

Up to 18 now!

[birdman]

27. Good job

Our guys ripped "Buck" a new one.

[TNOE]

29. #19 Should be coming up

You guys are DA BOMB!

[Scott Lee]

30. Is the majority waking up?

You might think so by looking at the responses to this turd's letter. Every single one was against him, most brilliantly written and right on the money.

If you take a gander at the "14 Defining Features of Fascism", this little dictator lackey displays an appalling affection for what makes a fascist state.

[TNOE]

31. Don't know but

it's nice to have one more on our side. Welcome to DU :hi:

[kimchi]

32. I replied also.

Still only 18 responses listed. Maybe mine's too long.

[TNOE]

33. Either it is taking a long time to

"reload" or "refresh" or whatever... but I always take it a little personal when I don't see my replies!!!!

[bbernardini]

34. Yes, it often takes a while...

It went from no responses to 14, then to 18.

[maggrwaggr]

35. well I'd say he's been soundly trounced

Pretty funny. A verbal dog-pile.

[Bozita]

36. I can't wait for the next edition of the "Daily Local" ...

... or is it the "Daily Loco?"

[Greyskye]

40. replied as well

22 responses are up now, with at least one more on its way. I'd love to see 'Buck's" face when he reads the replies to his little rant... :evilgrin:

[bbernardini]

41. 29!

"Buck" is probably too busy looking up illegal things he condemns others for. :)

What we really need to do is send all these views into the editor for publishing in the real print paper.

[Iverson]

42. and still 100% against

That is noteworthy that no one has rushed to his aid after seeing the first bunch earlier in the day.

[Jawja]

43. I got mine in...

"Blasphemy" indeed!!