Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could a re-elected Bush force Canada to support an expanded war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:40 AM
Original message
Could a re-elected Bush force Canada to support an expanded war
in the middle-east?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOT THIS CANADIAN
We are already planning the Resistance Movement here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If Bush gets re-elected
I want to be a Canadian, too. I've always liked the pacific northwest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt it
Canada seems to be drifting further away from us politically, if not economically. Their treatment of Native Americans, Medical Marujuana, Health Care, Immigrants, Gay Marriage and just about anything else leaves the Bush administration completely incompatible with those wild and crazy Canadians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Hi maingreen!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hi Swede
:hi: He wasn't elected the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. In a word, NO!
Canada was, is and always will be a PEACEKEEPING nation. We are very supportive of the UN and not of the warmongering Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. What I mean is if he says your with us or against us and mean it.
Especially if there was a big terrorist strike in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's something I've thought a lot about,
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 12:27 PM by Minstrel Boy
and I think the answer is yes.

I believe it would take a single terrorist event on Canadian soil to turn majority opinion, at least in the short term, towards giving Bush the benefit of the doubt. It won't need to be on the order of 9/11 or even Bali. A nightclub bombing will be enough.

And our soon-to-be Prime Minister, Paul Martin, will likely be much closer to Bush than Chretien was, less inclined to cause offense, and more amenable to signing on to the White House's projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Face it the US has Canada by the short and curlies

Because of trade ties and the differences in size between the two markets (Canada's population is roughly 10% of the US) if Canadian businesses were shut off from the US market we would be in a whole world of hurt. In a trade war the US would also hurt, but not to the same extent. While the US does need our oil and natural gas, if Canada ever threatened the US economy by shutting down energy exports to the US, I have no doubt the Canadian government would be overthrown either by overt or covert means.

If a Bush administration really decided to pull its weight to get the Canadian's onside in some military adventure, I would not be surprised if the Canadian politicians folded like a cheap lawn chair.
Of course if a revitalised conservative party ever came into power after the amalgamation of the wingnut Alliance Party and the Progressive Conservatives (as currently being discussed), it could be a moot point, especially if the more winger Alliance party emerges as the dominant power in the amalgamated conservative party. The current Alliance leader (and leader of the opposition), Stephen Harper, would love nothing more than to assure the Shrub of Canada's loyalty by afixing his lips to Shrub's posterior on behalf of all of Canada.


Since the Canadian military is small and not that well equipped for major military campaigns and therefore not really capable of offering much support in military terms, the main advantage of having Canada onside in a war is in the PR it could bring in the court of world opinion. I figure the Bush gang will probably just let things slide and don't slide as long as we keep shipping oil and natural gas south and don't cause too many waves by offering moral support to anti-Bush forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not if Canada will get off its butt and PLEASE make US a colony!

What the hell are all those Mounties doing trotting around the tundra when they could be launching a suprise cavalry charge into Michigan?

I want to see the whole PNAC bunch locked into a room and blasted with Alanis Morrissette at mega-volume while they wait for their Royal Canadian Non-Stop Hague flight!

I want to look out my window and see Inuit Special Forces in Snowmobiles with loudspeakers telling me I am liberated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't see terrorists wasting time and energy
and people and possibilities on a basically neutral country.
I can't imagine people turning to George if their country was
attacked. He would probably be pilloried as the person
responsible for making it possible for this to happen to Canada.

I doubt that Canada would give its sovereignity over to a
chimp.

Besides, Canada is fiercely independent of the idea of being
America light.

RV, in Alaska, an American state often confused as a Canadian
province. <Not altogether a bad thought> :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC