Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida courts no longer needed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:32 PM
Original message
Florida courts no longer needed.
In 2000 they were bypassed by the Supreme Court.

In 2003 they are bypassed by the Florida Legislature and Jeb.

It does not matter how I feel about what happened. It was a court decision overturned by the legislature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopthegop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. courts enforce the law
they changed the law...makes sense actually...regardless whether you agree with the outcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
The court horribly abused the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't care either way.
Isn't that called retroactively?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jeb Bush once again subverts the democratic process
the public voted for the class size amendment, and he ignores them. now the courts make a ruling and he dont like it, so he steps in.

people are letting their emotions cloud the issue. its tragic and there are the family issues.

But the bigger picture is more scary. another Bush policy ramrod. just like his brother, just like this war shoved down on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I would agree there are family issues.
Like why the loving hubby--- the one who conveniently remembered at the last second that Terri said she 'didn't want to be kept alive that way' (even though no other living sould ever heard her say such a thing)--- never spent a freakin' DIME of the malpractice settlement on her care, and stands to inherit the $700K that he hasn't already spent on his own legal bills, etc.. He wants to 'move on', so why not divorce her? oops, silly me--- if he did that, he wouldn't inherit the $700K when she dies. /sarcasm off

What happened today was unusual, but warranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. R E V O L T
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well Jebbie did say he had something ... up his sleeve .. how did he say
that?

Was it evil, deceptive.. I can't recall atm, but it was very blatant and evidently it wasn't a big deal since he's still here!

:spank:

Yes, I live in Florida and I'm very upset that jebbie was reelected!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Governors get to intervene when someone is sentenced to

death by the courts for a crime. Terri Schiavo was sentenced to death by the courts because she's severely disabled, which is not a crime.

I'm glad the governor and the legislature intervened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Been thinking about your post,
trying to figure out what it was about it that just didn't sit right. It opened up a lot of questions.

Isn't stay of execution one of the governor's constitutional powers?

Is it written anywhere that the legislature may immediately step in if the courts make a decision (any decision, not just this case) they don't agree with, and write a law more to their liking?

What are the legalities here?

Was the congressional decision to override the court constitutional? Do they have the power to do that? Did they overstep their authority?

Has anything like this happened before?

Now what?

Does it go back to the courts to decide?

Do any of my questions make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC