|
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 10:54 PM by Cat Atomic
I was reading the preface to The Bush Dyslexicon today, and I came accross a passage that surprised me. The author, Mark Crispin Miller, is referencing the fanatically positive press Bush got after 9-11, specifically the way the long-awaited recount results were hushed up in October of '01.
Miller writes the following:
...the media did Bush/Cheney an enormous favor, by killing the important news that Gore had won the vote in Florida, and so, according to the Constitution, ought to be our President. This inconvenient finding was played way, way down, as, by and large, the newsfolk either sat on it (ABC World News, NBC Nightly News), or brazenly distorted it, highlighting Bush's slender victory just in those four counties where Gore had sued for hand counts."
Is that in fact what happened? I completely missed that at the time. I recall hearing several television and radio reports on the subject, all repeating the same thing; that Bush had in fact won by a narrow margin, and all the calls for a recount had been a waste of time. They admitted the loss of the popular vote, but said it didn't matter because he'd legitimately won Florida, and the recount results had vindicated him.
Did he actually lose Florida? Is that just common knowledge that's been conveniently discarded? It seems like it might be... oh... mildly IMPORTANT if it's true.
So can anyone help out with some background info, links, anything to verify Miller's statement?
|