Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What abuses have happened due to the Patriot Act?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:41 AM
Original message
What abuses have happened due to the Patriot Act?
This is an unbelievably insulting Washington Post Article posted for Wednesday. I think all these Senators have drunk from Marie Antoinette's fountain of total disregard.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61591-2003Oct21.html

Patriot Act Misunderstood, Senators Say

In the article, Dianne Feinstein states,

"I have never had a single abuse of the Patriot Act reported to me," she said.

and of course Biden,

<< Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), called criticism of the Patriot Act "ill-informed and overblown" and commended prosecutors' work in some terrorism cases. >>

Those of you who have either had personal experience or knowledge and evidence of wrongdoing, please cite it here, so we can fax and email, and contact Senator Roberty Byrd, Teddy Kennedy, Moveon, True Majority, Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich, Amy Goodman, and whoever else, that there INDEED is a reason for being concerned.

Why all of a sudden NON-CONCERN from these Senators? That is a very good question.

So, Feinstein said she has not had ONE citing of problems with the Patriot Act. Is she supporting John Ashcroft over Americans at large? Please state any evidence of wrongdoing you know that has happened under the Patriot Act. Of course, much of the abuse is not even known or realized,because it is done via computer, and other electronic devices that reveal no evidence of being illegally monitored. However, there is plenty of other blatant acts that are occurring all too frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the effect on non-Muslims has been minimal
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 01:54 AM by DuctapeFatwa
And there is no reason to suppose that that will change, even after internment gets underway, unless the decision is made to include those suspected of Muslim sympathies, but that will affect only a very small number of people.

edit to note that while persons with a "Middle Eastern appearance" may, and probably will, included in the "protective shelter" phase, this will involve a population that will be overwhelmingly low-income members of ethnic minorities, and any unintended consequences that might impact the service industries that tend to employ this population can be offset by innovative strategies based on currently in-place inmate employment programs such as those that have been used in rural Alabama and Mississippi for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did I hear what you are saying...."after internment gets underway?"
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 02:17 AM by shance
I just printed this one off for record.

Thanks.

edit. I did hear what you are saying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you mean to say you have missed the advance work?

It began long before the 911 events.

What do you think Guantanamo is a prototype for?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. do you think, after re-selection
(unless diebold makes it moot, or the supremes dont select, they have taken a stance against bush in thier decisions) that you will see the partiot act be used on everybody, with dubya' need to kiss up to people gone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think he is kissing up now

and neither do the newly unemployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7th_Sephiroth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. he's kissing up
to the republican party so they dont boot his ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. oh, to the corporate oligarchy, sure

You, on the other hand, are to be empowered to adjust your wages to a globally competitive rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I am seeing some real racist stuff here.
Is this something you desire?

That Muslims are incarcerated at Guantanamo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I don't think Ducttape was saying that at all.
I think he was speaking ironically. From the point of view of the BFEE - this is their plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. yes, the plan seems pretty clear to me

and I imagine it seems even clearer to all the various disappeared individuals and their families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I desire to see the entire PNAC Crusade Krewe incarcerated in the Hague

I regret to inform you that neither the bush regime nor the corporate oligarchy proper consider my desires, although it is my hope that they will allow me the courtesy of an all cotton jumpsuit, as I am not fond of polyester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westerby Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Do we have to prove abuses in order to condemn the PA?
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 05:39 AM by westerby
I have never had a single abuse of the Patriot Act reported to me” (Feinstein). May be. But that does not mean that the Patriot Act is a good thing , even if Mrs. Feinstein seems to suggest that.
Even if no abuses had been reported, this would not impact the observation that the Patriot Act is an unprecedented and brutal curtailing of basic civil rights!
It is really outrageous that Feinstein and Biden try to impy that the Patriot Act is not that bad only because government authorities up to now have not fully exploited the extreme possibilities that the Patriot Act offers to them.

And what does “abuse” mean??? If a given action of authorities is legal according to P.A., this is, formally spoken, no abuse. But it can very well be an abuse of the spirit of the Constitution and the idea of civil rights. If you give the authorities unrestricted freedom, there will be not abuses, in a technical sense. But again, this does not make Patriot Act a good idea for the American people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippywife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. The potential is huge
The USAPA dessimates whole sections of federal code with regard to the seperation of foreign and domestic intelligence and investigations that have existed since 1947. It includes provisions for domestic terrorism and very vague definitions of such that will allow your local Barney Fife to decide what is and isn't domestic terrorism.

There are concerned citizens around this country working to have their city councils resolve to not uphold these provisions.

Go here and find these groups in your local area and get involved:

www.bordc.org

These people are citizen activists like you or I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Repuke > Repuke Lite
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 06:20 AM by Some Moran
Just ask Truman. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midwest_Doc Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not to be repitious, but ....
In Germany they came first for the Communists and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didn't
speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for
the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they
came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up.

Martin Niemöller 1892-1984
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC