Tommy Friedman begins to see the truth about Iraq

[frank frankly]

The great pseudo-intellectual of the BushCo Era is starting to wise up.

He's got a long way to go, but this is helpful, I think.

Free Advice to G.O.P.
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/23/opinion/23FRIE.html?pagewanted=print&position=

If I were a Republican senator, here's what I'd tell the Bush team:

• What in God's name are you doing forcing Iraqis to accept Turkish peacekeeping troops? Are you nuts? Not only will Turkish troops in Iraq alienate the Kurds, our best friends, but they will rile the Shiites and Sunnis as well. Honor is hugely important in Iraqi society, and bringing in Turkish soldiers — Iraq's former colonizers — to order around Iraqis would be a disaster. "If we bring in the Turks, it will bring back bad memories," notes Yitzhak Nakash, a Brandeis University professor and author of one of the best Iraq books, "The Shi'is of Iraq." "Worse, a Turkish presence in Iraq will only prompt the Iranians, Syrians and Saudis to try to increase their influence. That is no recipe for a stable country."

It's time for the Bush team to admit it made a grievous error in disbanding Iraq's Army — which didn't even fight us — and declare: "We thank all the nations who offered troops, but we think the Iraqi people can and must secure their own country. So we're inviting all former Iraqi Army soldiers (not Republican Guards) to report back to duty. For every two Iraqi battalions that return to duty (they can weed out their own bad apples), we will withdraw an American one. So Iraqis can liberate themselves. Our motto is Iraq for the Iraqis."

[RichM]

1. Tommy is not capable of 'wising up.' I know what you mean, of course --

this particular article is not as toxic as most of TF's work -- but look at this sentence from the last paragraph:

Bottom line: We still haven't established a moderate political center in Iraq ready to openly embrace the progressive U.S. agenda for Iraq and openly defend it....

"Progressive US" agenda for Iraq? Say, what?

Tommy can't wise up. The best he can do is that sometimes, he can be less repulsive than other times. Once you've committed crimes of dishonest journalism of the magnitude that Tommy has, you've pretty much staked out a firm & irreversible position.

[Flying_Pig]

2. You mean Mr. PNAC at the N.Y> Times?

The bastard beat the drums so loudly, calling for war, backing everything PNAC, and Israel wanted. I've always felt like he was far more concerned with Israel, who wanted the U.S. to invade Iraq in the worst way, than our nation. I think he's a traitor, and one of a handful of truly detestable columnists at the Times.

[wtmusic]

4. Agree

Friedman is now attempting to negotiate the maze of his own contradictions. Stay tuned.

[frank frankly]

3. Please know that I despise, mortally despise, Tommy Friedman

I was just gauging the temperature of the whore media.

Trust me, I loathe Tommy Friedman. He is cheerleader to the war criminals.