Democratic Candidates 'Bad, Nasty' Rhetoric ... Response?

[hamsterhuey]

Hey All,

You've probably heard a lot about Democratic candidates being accuse of mudding the campaign, having unprecedented campaign rhetoric, saying nasty stuff, appealing to the lowest dominators in the party, etc. I'm trying to write something against someone who has told me this, and I was wondering if there are good stuff (articles, etc) out there showing that hypocrisy on the parts of Republicans, etc, about this kind of attack. Thanks.

[JackSwift]

1. Tell the 'pukes that if they want to make that an issue

then they should say so, and set a time and a place for a debate and you will prove that their candidate and his proxies are responsible for more than any candidate he cares to choose ('cept Lieberman cause he is one of theirs), and that you have until that time to show which is slinging more mud. You bet $100 that you can show his/her man (Bush, duh, he's the only Rep running for president) is behind more of it. He/she won't take the bet? Well then shut up the shit coming out his/her mouth cuz once again, he/she is spewing shit and he/she is a liar and not to come around you with crappy lies that they won't back up. Only a COMMUNIST spews political crappy lies without a bet to back them up. Is he/she a COMMUNIST? When they say they don't have time to research all the lies Dems tell, you look at your watch and say, "you've been wasting my time for x minutes already, how many more minutes you gonna waste my time when you could be improving yourself at the library by looking up all the lies you tell"

[mbartko]

2. Oh, I'd respond...

But it would most likely just be some bad, nasty rhetoric.

[w4rma]

3. Bush's attacks on McCain before the South Carolina primary

Bush did some push polling in South Carolina that basically said that McCain had a black bastard child.

Also, Bush attacked McCain by basically saying he went crazy while he was locked up in the POW camp in Vietnam.

That is from memory.