Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11. "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:26 AM
Original message
"Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11. "
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 11:31 AM by protect freedom impe
Quotes

"Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11. Osama bin Laden did, and as far as we know he's still alive. There's no question ... he has significant stocks of chemical and biological agents. I think we have to assume that if he knows we're coming ...he'll do everything he can to use them.
That's the only risk ...it's an issue the president has to address."

-- Our last elected (and smartest) president - twice-elected without an appointment by his daddy's crooked Supreme Court Judges



---------------------------------------------


Rumsfeld Blows Administration's Cover,
Says He Sees No Link Between Iraq, 9-11

The Guardian (UK) reports: "Defense Secretary Rumsfeld said Tuesday he had no reason to believe that Saddam Hussein had a hand in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. At a Pentagon news conference, Rumsfeld was asked about a poll that indicated nearly 70% of respondents believed the Iraqi leader probably was personally involved. 'I've not seen any indication that would lead me to believe that I could say that,' Rumsfeld said. He added: '...e know of various other activities. But on that specific one, no, not to my knowledge.' The Bush administration has asserted that Saddam's government had links to al-Qaida. And in various public statements over the past year or so administration officials have suggested close links. Vice Resident Cheney said on Sunday, for example, that success in stabilizing and democratizing Iraq would strike a major blow at the 'the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11.'"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3155404,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. **DRIPPING WITH SARCASM!!**
BUT WAIT A MINUTE!! HOW CAN YOU TRUST A MAN WHO HAD HIS PEEPEE PLAYED WITH IN THE OVAL OFFICE!!! HE IS NOT LIKE OUR FEARLESS MORAL LEADER SHRUBBOY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. visualise...
deactivating caps lock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. sorry
too much caffine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. 'salright
its happens to the best of us. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. The interesting question...
...especially for the loony LIHOP crowd, is whether the Big Dog is a rightwing dupe for believing that bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 instead of subscribing to one of their nutty conspiracy theories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi's.
Poppy Bush had business deals with the Saudi's, and probably still does. We blew up the wrong country. No one can dispute that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I would have much preferred a regime change in Saudi Arabia
...rather than Iraq. Why that country isn't on the list of state sponsors of terrorism is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. They control the news.
No news station owned by a corporation is going to tell the truth about what is going on right now. If the news stations reported the real news then the money would not continue to go where it is going right now. That is what:

http://www.blackboxvoting.com

and

http://www.blackboxvoting.org

are all about. Think about it. If 3 million unemployed peoples votes were actually counted AND recorded, the money would stop going where it is going now. Go Bev Harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. alls I knows is that when 9/11 happened
Bush was prezident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do you hate America?
</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Niether did bin laden.
And 9 of the 19 alleged hijackers were misidentified...

Which leaves who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ahhh thank god for The Guardian
America's best newspaper! By the way, has anybody heard anything about the weekly U.S. version of the paper I heard some talk about a while back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC