Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia Ridicules Court's Gay Sex Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:28 PM
Original message
Scalia Ridicules Court's Gay Sex Ruling
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (news - web sites) ridiculed his court's recent ruling legalizing gay sex, telling an audience of conservative activists Thursday that the ruling ignores the Constitution in favor of a modern, liberal sensibility.

Must be that seldom mentioned anti-sodomy amendment. :eyes:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031024/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_scalia_2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. He seriously frightens me
I was just going to post this, BTW.

I've often been thankful he's not my father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody needs to fuck this guy up the ass
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 09:31 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
TO clear out his colon so his brain can see since his ass appears to be his point of reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was going to post something similar...
..but didn't want to give the DU gay population nightmares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoMoreRedInk Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What an amazing sentiment. Thank you for the levity. I just....
laughed out loud. DU never cease to amaze me. I love this place.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. wha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. NSMA, Don't Hold Your Breath for Volunteers.
Isn't his brain part of his ass? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. LOL -- wait... should I laugh that that? Oh well.. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. the Constitution...?
the Constitution????

:wtf: is Tony smokin???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. this snip says it ALL about the repubes:
"Scalia wrote a bitter dissent in the gay sex case that was longer than the ruling itself."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. He uses the word 'modern' like an insult
It must be dark in there...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ex_jew Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Apparently the laws in effect at that time are ipso facto
"Constitutional". Who even needs legislatures, when we can simply refer to the law circa 1789 ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Antonin Scalia brightens my day
if someone that retarded can be a Supreme Court justice then I sure as hell can get my sorry ass through law school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think of him as the Italian Rush Limbaugh
They have so much in common
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. scalia
He and John Asscroft are auditioning for the role of Torquemada. I place no bets on who performs the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is way too political
to be on the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let him run his mouth
If he says enough now then if gay marrage is ever before the court he may have to recuse himself from that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. And People Wonder Why I LOATHE Republicans and Christian Fundamentalists..
... what's worse: "despise" or "loathe". Whichever one it is... that's how I feel.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HPLeft Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's a sick dude
The next Democratic nominee has to really young (so that they'll be around for a while) and pretty far to the left - if only to balance out Scalia and Thomas.

What I really wanted the court to address was the important constitutional question of why a woman with a strap-on doing a man isn't sodomy, but two men using having sex is? Or whether two women, one with a strap-on, is also Sodomy - or just material for the kind of movie that Clarence Thomas like to rent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That Kind Of Thinking Would Make Their Heads Explode
... I'll leave it up to you to figure out which one I'm talking about.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. He must have been aroused
at some point in his past by men. This is the only explanation of his behaivor. Typical of most closet redneck guys I know here in the South. They are a little TOO disturbed by gay men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Scalia is a repressed gay in the closet
and I'll bet the farm he has sex fantasies about Clarence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Exactly.
Just like Billy "Blackjack" Bennett;
Jimmy "Sexpot" Swaggart & Bakker;
Rush "Poppers" Lardbutt;
I could go on all day.

Those who are abnormally obsessed with a particular topic are more often than not (90%? 99%?) of the time prooven to be the very ones doing themselves what they are condemm in others.

Hypocrisy = Republican/Conservative/Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. How does it ignore the Constitution?
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 11:59 PM by Selwynn
Would someone play the role of "opposition prep" and give me the argument on how the Supreme's ruling ignores the Constitution?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Scalia is literally & really a fascist
He has stated publicly that the ultimate form of loyalty is due to the state. Well, ultimately God, but his logic, if I recall correctly, was that the state is the manifestation of God's will on earth. The statement I'm thinking of was made before the end of the previous SCOTUS term. No, not your family, not your religion (well, I guess if you are a conservative, Latin-Mass-making Roman Catholic, it's all mixed together...), not your idea of freedom: you owe your life to your state, because in theory the state makes it possible for you to survive. Shoot, I am going to go after the quotes now; I hate being this imprecise.

He makes me ashamed to be Italian-American, he really does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. Did Scalia mention that the ruling is going to lead to Senator on dog sex?
As I understand it, this will occur only in Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. The Constitution???
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ... ridiculed his court's recent ruling legalizing gay sex, telling an audience of conservative activists Thursday that the ruling ignores the Constitution in favor of a modern, liberal sensibility.

Since when does the Constitution address gay sex? Last time I looked, it didn't. It did offer equal rights to all citizens, however.

It's really too bad... if individual states would stop making laws depriving groups of people of their Constitutional rights there would be no need for the Supreme Court to step in and make rulings that limit the power of the states. These "Christians" that are so into punishing people for stepping out of line ought to understand that their states stepped out of line and are getting their knuckles rapped for doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
27. Let's Start One Of Those "Pat Robertson Style" Prayer Chains...
... to see what we can do about Mr. Scalia.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. They Made CSPAN Turn Off The Cameras For This!
I was watching Washington Journal this morning and Brian Lamb, with a clearly sardonic tone, mentioned that they didn't have the speech on tape because Scalia and his sponsors made everyone turn off cameras and tape recorders.

What is this guy so afraid of? I know the answer.

That if they have him on tape actually saying this stuff, he'll be exposed as the lunatic he really is.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. One Other Thing
What is it with these guys who believe that the Constitution is writ from God and etched in stone? He actually was introduced as a man who was appointed to be sure that the Constitution is implemented EXACTLY AS WRITTEN!

If it's immutable, and not subject to the shifts in social mores, then why would we even need a Supreme Court to interpret it? If it's immutable, the framers wouldn't have even bothered to put a Supreme Court in the document.

The very existence within the document of the format and charge of the Supreme Court means that the framers intended the Constitution to be mutable and evolutionary.

I guess Scalia's not smart enough to see this obvious truth.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. Somebody should tell him its genetic (new evidence)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031022062408.htm

Refuting 30 years of scientific theory that solely credits hormones for brain development, UCLA scientists have identified 54 genes that may explain the different organization of male and female brains. Published in the October edition of the journal Molecular Brain Research, the UCLA discovery suggests that sexual identity is hard-wired into the brain before birth and may offer physicians a tool for gender assignment of babies born with ambiguous genitalia.

“Our findings may help answer an important question — why do we feel male or female?” said Dr. Eric Vilain, assistant professor of human genetics and urology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a pediatrician at UCLA’s Mattel Children’s Hospital. “Sexual identity is rooted in every person’s biology before birth and springs from a variation in our individual genome.”

Since the 1970s, scientists have believed that estrogen and testosterone were wholly responsible for sexually organizing the brain. In other words, a fetal brain simply needed to produce more testosterone to become male. Recent evidence, however, indicates that hormones cannot explain everything about the sexual differences between male and female brains.

Vilain and his colleagues explored whether genetic influences could explain the variations between male and female brains. Using two genetic testing methods, they compared the production of genes in male and female brains in embryonic mice — long before the animals developed sex organs.

To their surprise, the researchers found 54 genes produced in different amounts in male and female mouse brains, prior to hormonal influence. Eighteen of the genes were produced at higher levels in the male brains; 36 were produced at higher levels in the female brains.

“We didn’t expect to find genetic differences between the sexes’ brains,” Vilain said. “But we discovered that the male and female brains differed in many measurable ways, including anatomy and function.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC