|
Edited on Fri Oct-24-03 10:24 AM by Octafish
Not that I'm an expert, but from what I've read and heard:
The Agency has many different levels, populated by people with many different personal associations and professional loyalties. Some have been with the Agency from way back, although the “Clark Cliffords” are few and far between these days. Some have been appointed by GOPers, some by DEM administrations, others hired by one or the other.
Even with all these varied histories, what the vast, vast majority have in common is loyalty to the United States of America and are sworn to uphold, protect and defend its Constitution. It is not the fault of the rank-and-file they have been misled down the years by W or Poppy or Helms or whomever. James Bamford and a few other authors can paint a far better picture.
Personally for me and the millions of Americans who still care: The agency has a lot of explaining to do for their relationship to Lee Harvey Oswald and the cover-up of the shenanigans in Mexico City, for starters. James Jesus Angleton sounds like he was a very complicated fellow.
Again, Dallas and Vietnam and the rest of the policy (ugh!) shortcomings are the fault of the higher-ups. These turds of what Jonathan Vankin calls Capitalism's Invisible Army serve Wall Street and those who own Wall Street. Gore Vidal calls them the "War Party" who profit from the perpetual war. He may be on to something, but that, again is the leadership.
With regards to the present situation, where the CIA is getting set up by Rove to take the Iraqi fall: The CIA camel’s back is long broken. The last straw was the treasonous outing of Valerie Plame to send the political warning to others who may rock the boat like Amb. Joe Wilson. The men and women in the agency see that the Bush cabal was willing to risk, not only the life and network contacts’ lives for the sake of making a political warning, they willingly compromised the National Security of the US.
Plame and her work are that important — she was helping fight the spread of nuclear weapons and other WMDs. Hey, the Russians say they can't account for many of their tactical nukes from the USSR days. So, using her to get to her husband was a mistake of historic and treasonous proportions because it made the US militarily less secure. I hope it gets some people arrested and tried for treason under the USA PATRIOT Act of not, that may be a capital offense.
The rank-and-file have signalled they have taken all the BS they are going to allow from Bush and his PNAC-Moonie toadies in the White House and Congress. You see, Solomon, the regular officers, operatives, and analysts may be predominantly Republican, but the people in the CIA are loyal to the United States. They see the people who Bush works for are not.
PS: Maybe this should be put in a calculus Dyslectic W can understand:
CIA Big. Bush small.
Or how Poppy would explain it to Dim Son:
"CIA Good. W bad."
EDIT: durn typos.
|