Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Some Democratic Hopefuls (And Me) Question Value of Debates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 01:00 AM
Original message
NYT: Some Democratic Hopefuls (And Me) Question Value of Debates
The heart of the problem, officials at many of the campaigns say, is that a debate of nine people hobbles candidates from standing out above the amusing wisecracks of stragglers in the polls like, say, the Rev. Al Sharpton. They have so little time that the only way they can win notice is to level a direct, nasty attack — and even that does not always work.

"It's time for the rubber to hit the road," Ms. Brazile said. "It's time for some of the candidates to stay home."

Ms. Braun said she would do no such thing. "The Democratic Party, of all parties, should stand for the big tent for real, and not something determined by how much money you have and how many ads you can buy," she said. "I'm in it to win it." Mr. Kucinich said he was in it for the long haul, too. Mr. Sharpton did not respond to a request for comment, but a spokeswoman, Rachel Noerdlinger, said he had "no intention of withdrawing under any circumstances."

Often, the candidates resort to stylistic nuance as a way to stand out. In the CNN debate, some candidates engaged in an off-camera sleeve-rolling competition during a commercial break. Mr. Edwards, General Clark and Mr. Kucinich folded twice along the cuff. Mr. Gephardt folded his cuff in half and rolled it four times. Howard Dean rolled his sleeves up the highest.

Ultimately, campaign aides said, the problem comes down to too many candidates, too little air time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/25/politics/campaigns/25DEBA.html?ex=1067659200&en=9384c379c19f7951&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Some Democratic Hopefuls (And I) Love Debates - eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Debates Entail Actual Discussion
Not just the presence of competing people tossing off sound-bites. I love watching debates, too, but these hardly qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It would be good to see them without their handlers,
just no personal insults, please.

Honest, no coaching, no rhetoric, open discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. They have a point
and I wouldn't mind seeing a debate with the big six; Gep, Edwards, Clark, Kerry, Dean, and Lieberman. But I can also see the unfairness in excluding the lower tier candidates, they are spending money and putting themselves on the line too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. define "stragglers"
I'll hold you to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. "They're very superficial," he (Kerry) added.
The debates or the "most shrill, conflict-oriented, confrontational voices?" (I wonder to what and to whom he is referring.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-03 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kerry is the ONLY one who seems to be WHINING about this
the headline is misleading.

Kerry's a wimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC