Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Studs Terkel: Joe Lieberman should be Bush's Running Mate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jefff Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:51 AM
Original message
Studs Terkel: Joe Lieberman should be Bush's Running Mate
From a kickass interview in a small Chicago publication, "The Onion A.V. Club". The full quote was:

"If I were Bush's brain"—that's Karl Rove, his Rasputin—"I would draft Joe Lieberman to be the running mate for George Bush."

Studs has a new book comming out about activism and activists. It sounds like the big feature is a comparison between Bush, Schwarzenegger, and Kucinich. Here's the link:

http://www.theonionavclub.com/3941/feature1.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would Lieberman desert?
It's an interesting question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Can we force him to leave?
better yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Would a pig feed at the trough?
Would a rudderless ship go the direction the wind blows? Would a whore spread her legs for money?

I like the last, I'll leave it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I thought that he had already.

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. He already has!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a beatable ticket that would be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's a Kucinich man.
Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. critical excerpt
But they've never heard of a guy named Dennis Kucinich. You know who Dennis Kucinich is, don't you? He's the least known of the nine candidates for the presidential Democratic ticket. He's the one you don't know. He's by far the most qualified guy. Boy mayor of Cleveland. He fought corporate power and he won. He's the chairman of the Progressive Caucus of the Democratic Party. He's the one who first told Bush "Go to hell!" when it came to the pre-emptive strike. He said "No!" The first one to do it. He's the one who said "No!" when it came to sanctions, hurting, killing kids, you don't hurt the brute Saddam at all. He's the one who said "No!" to tax cuts that would just benefit a few. But people don't know who he is. He's never mentioned in the news—just a throwaway phrase, "The ninth candidate." And he's the closest thing there is to the answer. People looking for a guy with guts, with principles, here he is. And one in a thousand Americans knows his name. You've heard of Al Sharpton, you've heard of a million of those other guys, you've heard of that clown Joe Lieberman, who would be a perfect running mate for George W. Bush. Because we misuse our language. We speak of "winnability," meaning, of course, being more moderate, which means, of course, being more centrist, which means, of course, going closer and closer and closer to the right. That's what it means. We pervert our language, as well. I want him to be known, so he can make a speech at the Democratic convention, so he can get a little clout. In any event, I don't mean to talk so much about him. I was talking about the American people. So they don't... We know who runs the media, let's face it. Fox is owned by the Australian Neanderthal, Rupert Murdoch. You know the people on it. These are powerful people, and Americans hear that day after day. And there's a muscle-headed muscleman named Schwarzenegger, and most of the white women voted for him, despite what his record seems to have been. Doesn't matter: known. You've got Oprah Winfrey, the Teflon girl. She had him on for a whole hour. Did she have any opponent on? Most astonishing thing in the world. No one has ever challenged her. She says, "We didn't talk about politics." But if it's not political advertising, what the hell is? And no one ever thinks of saying, "Hey, why aren't others on?" She's got millions of women listeners, doesn't she? And it's white women who voted tremendously for this clown. So I use him as a grotesque case in point. Contrast him with Dennis Kucinich, who nobody knows. So we got a lopsided... The assault going on is an assault on our intelligence, an assault on our decency.

Ladies and gentlemen...if old Studs Terkel says the only choice is Dennis, who am I to argue :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefff Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Studs has a Point
Yes, this was the core of the interview for me. I've been wishy-washy about Kucinich. I've been favoring Dean because I think he has a better chance. But Stud's digression on the fallacy of "winnability" changed my mind. Kucinich is, by any good definition, a heroic leader.

So what if he scares the comfortable middle-class? So what if he won't get a lot of corporate contributions? And so what if the centrist DLC despises him? As Studs said at the begining of this interview:

"If the Democratic Party can't beat this guy, the Democratic Party should dissolve. It's in the hands of something called the Democratic Leadership Council, ever hear of them? They run it, and they ought to be tossed out on their asses immediately."

What more can you say?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. If you want to give Studs all due deference and recognition...
it's hard to say anything else. I think he's well versed on the history of politics in the last 70-80 years...I can respect what he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love Studs Terkel
I still get out his old book "Working" when I need a good kick in the pants.

Lieberman is such a schmuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lieberman has floated John McCain as his Sec. of State
Today, on a morning show, he was asked about McCain as his running mate. He waffled, but I don't think it's unreasonable to think he'd choose McCain. If by some chance Lieberman were the nominee, we'd be asked to vote for one of either Republican set of candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. That's absurd, and I'll tell you why.
There are two major, major aspects to Bush's agenda: War and tax cuts. Lieberman has, to be sure, supported the former with all his enthusiasm. However, he has been an outspoken critic of the tax cuts, and there's no way that puts him in line with the neocons in this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. well....
That'll be one way to ensure that the Bush ticket doesn't get any Democratic votes. Run Joe Run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
13.  GOP Bush*/Lieberman in 04 ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC