Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jay Rockefeller (D) can cry me a river over his Iraq vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 12:49 PM
Original message
Jay Rockefeller (D) can cry me a river over his Iraq vote
It's too late now, sad sack. You provided no rebuttal for this insane decision.

Rockefeller visited our troops in the Middle East over the summer and reported back, "I don't see any morale problem here."

http://estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=18086

Nearly half of the troops surveyed said they do not plan to re-enlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I support his anti-administration stance now, but yes I agree. Also...
are these politicians soo stupid as to think that sad sack Gomer Pyle is going to lay it out all on the table as far as how things are f**ked up?

These guys aren't going to say a damned thing to you Mr. Rockefeller. Are you THAT stupid?

They have to remain in Iraq. Remain in their unit. Have to take orders from their commanding officer. If Gomer were to spew off to you about how bad things are, do you think that he wouldn't suffer repercussions because he did that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-03 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. he's a twit
He's whining now about the partisan nature of the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into the pre-war intelligence, but when he had the opportunity - a little more than a week ago - he voted against an amendment to the 87B giveaway to establish an independent, non-partisan panel to investigate. Said that the SIC could do it all in a non-political way.

This was perhaps 9 days ago. He didn't know what was in his own committee's report, but he stood up and advised Senate Democrats to vote against the amendment. And NOW he complains that it's a partisan document?

Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC