Anyone just see Clark on fox news?

[IranianDemocrat]

I missed it how was he?

[sfecap]

1. He sucked.

n/t

[WillyBrandt]

2. Why?

I mean, seriously, why this pointless, nasty trashing of a competing candidate? Just an utterly mindless snub.

[sfecap]

4. Beats me...think of that the next time you do it.

n/t

[WillyBrandt]

The next time I do it?

I don't. I have criticized Dean for being too centrist, for his stance on guns, and for misrepresenting the other Democrats in the primary.

I have never--and would never--do something as stupid and snide as reply to a "How was it" post with "He sucked." There's just so little integrity in doing that. It's almost unbelievable.

[blm]

7. But when you criticize honestly they interpret what you said

as "He sucks." That's good enough for them, because they prefer that coarsened tone of the debate.

[Mz Pip]

6. Be specific please

What did he say or so that made you think he sucked.

Oh wait, never mind. You didn't really see it, you just saw this as an opportunity to trash Clark. How predictable. :crazy:

MzPip
:dem:

[bigendian]

3. Why, what did he say?

:kick:

[SeveneightyWhoa]

16. Can you tell us WHY he sucked?

Or are you just saying that because you're a bitter coward? I think this type of idiocy would be best compensated for with a quick banning.

[GabysPoppy]

17. Locking

This thread does not have any intrinsic value and is going nowhere.

GabysPoppy

DU Moderator

[bigendian]

5. I think someone "turned out the lights" on this thread.

:kick:

Now we can all just swing wildly in the dark.

[hlthe2b]

8. DO WE HAVE TO DISRUPT THREADS OURSELVES?!!!!

Don't we have enough trolling Freepers to do this for us? I think ID had a valid question in his/her thread and I for one resent others from highjacking it with snide comments so that none of us gain any insight.

Like Clark, Don't like Clark. We have a right to at least discuss him. Please chill out, folks...

[WillyBrandt]

9. No

We've got a couple of usual suspects throwing feces whenever the name Clark comes up. No thought, no insight. Just slinging crap.

[kayleybeth]

10. Sad, but true, WB

and they really reflect badly on their own candidate(s).

[Name removed]

11. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[annxburns]

12. Dean is sometimes ...

.... done a disservice by his supporters. They seem to think that reflecting to the extreme his combative attitude is going to win him new converts. Basically, I haven't decided between Kerry, Edwards or Clark, but Dean has dropped way down on my list because of this.

[wyldwolf]

13. Even though my last post was deleted, I agree with you..

..it is some of Dean's almost militant supporters who have hurt Dean's candidacy in my view - not Dean himself.

[Padraig18]

15. I agree.

It is one thing to promote your candidate, or to factually refute inaccuracies about his/her statements, but it is something else altogether to just 'trash' a candidate you don't support. Hell, I even defend other candidates when I think they're being 'bashed', even though I don't support them. :shrug:

People aren't helping Howard long-term by alienating the supporters of othger candidates; we need THEIR votes in November--- not just our own.

[Mz Pip]

14. Amen

This kind of crap is intellectually lazy. Just throw out crap and scurry off back under a rock. Silly and immature, as well.

MzPip
:dem: