Should we have more debates with fewer candidates?
Rooktoven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-26-03 11:14 PM
Original message |
Should we have more debates with fewer candidates? |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-26-03 11:21 PM by Rooktoven
Candidates could agree to forums with smaller numbers present and more direct questioning between themselves. Mix and match from week to week--sort of like whoever wants to play on topic x that week... I'd watch.
|
Rowdyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-26-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There should be a maximum of four candidates per debate... |
|
more voices than that simply get lost.
|
John_Shadows_1
(289 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-26-03 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think we should go tournament style ... |
|
... with one-on-one matchups, with the winners moving up based on charisma, policy accuracy, crowd respones and PAC account. Then a big final event with the chips on the table.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.