I live in NYC, but I did not attend the protests this past weekend in DC. Besides having gone for several weekends without one to just spend to myself and with my wife, I really didn't feel called to attend. I believed it would be another meeting that would degenerate into a hodgepodge of so many messages that, well, there would end up being NO message. And it seems that my premonition was right.
Here's an article from Alternet.org that, IMHO, sums this dilemma up better than I ever could. The gist of it is that we need to coordinate our message around a few distinct themes, rather than allowing it to instead become a "come out and voice your pet cause" event featuring signs decrying the dangers of GM foods, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, FTAA, Free Mumia, and so on. Not that people who invest time and energy in these causes are wasting their time -- but rather, by choosing this venue (about the US occupation of Iraq) as a venue to voice their views, they are doing a grave disservice to all those who want to get the US occupation in Iraq to an end.
Rally Recipe Wins No PrizesBy Traci Hukill, AlterNet
October 27, 2003
It was, as the saying goes, all good. The weather was great. The crowd was pissed but in a cheerful, spirited way. The Washington, DC cops, though fully in thrall to their Powellesque doctrine of completely unnecessary and overwhelming force, more or less just lined up in their cruisers, saddles, motorcycles, dirt bikes, bicycles and black boots and watched the proceedings. The A.N.S.W.E.R. coalition and United for Peace and Justice, the two organizers, had obviously mended fences after some squabbles earlier in the year, so that was nice.
In fact, except for its totally unfocused message and the fact that organizers missed a golden opportunity by not holding it three weeks earlier, the anti-war rally in Washington, DC on Saturday was a tremendous success.
SNIP
The first thing such an observer might have noticed is that the rally's message was an omnibus, diffuse expression of dissatisfaction on many fronts. While that is an important thing for a constituency to communicate, it fails as a strategy for making a coherent point engineered to ignite change, which is, I believe, what a rally is supposed to do. This was a cupboard casserole of a demonstration, something thrown together with whatever was on hand. The main ingredients were "end the occupation now" (mushroom soup),"Bush is a liar who should be impeached" (noodles) and "bring our troops home safely" (tuna fish). That is a fairly harmonious combination, one enhanced by "Dude, Where's My Country?" (salt) and "Osama bin forgotten" (pepper).
Unfortunately, other, less compatible, ingredients worked their way in: "support to the Palestinians" (beets), "no to the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas" (pickle relish) and "does your food have a face?" (Apple Jacks). These points of view were expounded both by speakers and by the placard-bearers in the crowd, to the detriment of the rally at large; worthy though each may be as an independent concern, their addition to the mix confused the message hopelessly and probably made it just a little too easy for anyone peering out the windows of the West Wing (not the president; he was in Camp David) to dismiss the whole crowd as a bunch of wackos.
MUCH, MUCH MORE...
These snippets represent the overall theme, but there is much more. Perhaps the most telling statement is the fact that the author saw only one person with a sign announcing what the primary thrust of the rally probably SHOULD have been --
US out, UN in -- but it was lost in a myriad of other causes, and therefore, this blunt, accurate message went largely ignored or unseen by anyone who might have been viewing the rally from the outside.