|
After he was heckled in Australia (in and out of Parliament), the best response he could muster was : "Who can possibly think that the world would be better off with Saddam Hussein still in power?"
Is that the best he can offer at this late stage in the game? He sounds like a five-year-old stomping his feet. This old canard is so off-base and irrelevant, yet he still probably thinks it's impeccable logic. Such a statement, as his only response to being heckled by a member of an "allied" government in the Iraq War, clearly demontrates that he has utterly exhausted any and all possible justifications for this war, and/or simply does not have the capacity for critical thinking.
Sure, in and of itself, the world might be better without Saddam... maybe in that fantasy world where we could just magically make Saddam disappear. But many things had to happen for us to rid the world of Saddam, and most of the "bad" in those things has far outweighed the "good" done by ridding the world of Saddam (and we really haven't even done that, have we?).
|