The House of Cards is falling down

[Must_B_Free]

- Connection between Christian Reconstructionists and Islamic terrorists through Grover Norquist / Islamic charity funding

- Bush stonewalling 911 investigation - won't release documents, yet claims to be "helping".

- And the same people outed a CIA WMD investigator - effectively a general in the war on terror?

How many are prepared to face what many of us have known since 9/11 - that the Bush administration, the hard right, was complicit in the 911 attacks?

It is so obvious, yet hard to embrace, emotionally. That's how you hide a big lie - right out in the open.

- look at where the money flowed from to instigate the attacks
- look at where the money and power have flown as a result of 911
- look at who is hiding evidence
- look at who benefitted (certainly wasn't AlQueda).
- look at who was calling for a 9-11 style attack to use as the impetus of their published world domination plan which is, at this moment, proceeding as planned (2 down a few more to go).

Now ask youself - who did it?

If you cannot tell who the bad guy is here, you need to keep thinking.

[elfwitch]

1. they don't encourage thinking

That is the problem. They don't think. They take whatever Fox news tells them as gospel. Thinking is bad. Thinking gets you in trouble.

[On the Road]

2. What's the Connection Between

Christian Reconstructionists and Islamic terrorists? I missed that one.

I do think the tone is changing, thought. No more "popular war president." "Exaggerating the evidence to get us into Iraq" has been repeated so often it's become an indelible meme like "I am not a crook."

The more people hear about the Valerie Plame incident, the more support Bush loses.

And I'm sure there will be more surprises. The CIA is now on the case. Cheers!

[Beetwasher]

4. Oh, that's a good one!

Grover Norquist was behind the hiring of the muslim chaplains arrested at Gitmo and also behind the stonewalling of investigations into the Saudi's financing of terrorists! Revealed on Keith Olberman....There's a transcript floating around...

[Must_B_Free]

5. Here

Consistent with his radical background, Nawash has served as counsel for Abdul Rahman al-Amoudi, who authorities arrested in September for alleged illegal financial dealings with, and travel to, Libya. “Court documents filed late last Wednesday night claim al-Amoudi has provided ‘financial support to Hamas’ and ‘financial support to fronts for al-Qaida,’” according to NBC News. Describing Al-Amoudi after his arrest, Nawash said, “He is just a liberal Muslim, who wants more Muslims to be involved in the U.S. military and politics to be part of America.” The kinds of people that al-Amoudi might want to involve in the U.S. military probably wouldn’t do much to increase the security of Nawash’s potential constituents.

Conservative stalwart and head of Americans for Tax Reform Grover Norquist has backed Nawash and planned to host a Nawash fundraiser in his home. Interest in Nawash might stem from Norquist’s alliance with al-Amoudi. Norquist is al-Amoudi’s registered lobbyist and has allegedly used his GOP connections to facilitate White House access for extreme Islamists. In addition to accepting substantial seed money from al-Amoudi when he co-founded the Islamic Institute, Norquist has forged relationships with characters such as alleged Islamic Jihad fundraiser Sami Al-Arian, who is in federal custody. Pointed criticism of Norquist has led to internal conservative strife; Norquist has responded primarily by playing the race card. Interestingly, Norquist has lobbied against anti-terror legislation.


http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=10516

[Must_B_Free]

3. From Yahoo: 9-11...Blood Is On Bush's Hands

by: jasonx3000 (27/M)

Kent State professor Walter Davis has articulated in a very coherent way the argument against George W. Bush continuing as the commander of the most deadly arsenal ever seen on this planet.

Read the whole piece at:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm

It's titled "Compelling Evidence for Complicity." Davis points out the government has tried to cop a plea of ineptitude in failing to prevent the 9/11 disaster, but the professor concludes this excuse is "not consistent with the known facts."

With flawless logic and perfect professorial prose, Davis outlines and elaborates 22 reasons why he thinks Bush not only knew but helped plan and execute the tragic 9/11 deception. Davis's items range from the fact that the entire U.S. intelligence community knew the attack was going to happen and the American air defenses were "stood down" ... to historical precedents of leaders who lied about attacks in history. In between is the definitive version of the charges that should be laid upon Bush and all the criminal functionaries who participated in this profound crime against the American people.

I seldom say things are a "must read," but this is one of them, simply for its articulation of the basic crimes of 9/11 and the completeness of the magnitude of the atrocity and its implications.

Read the damn thing. Try not to cry.

[Jazzgirl]

6. I read (and saved) that article when it came out.

It is compelling and frightening reading. Davis is very systematic in outlining the logic that Dubya knew about and did nothing to stop the attacks.

Jazzgirl

[meisje]

7. all fine and dandy for the 1% of people this place represents

the rest of the country has to believe it

[Must_B_Free]

8. You'd be surprised

People know what's happening, they just don't want to say it.

What's really happening is a psychologic Civil war in America - the mad losers of previous wars have combined to repay vengenance.

The current enemy is a hybrid of Nazi and Confederate intentions - a"blowwback" of our own, you might say.

[frank frankly]

9. "a psychological Civil War"

wow. that is it!

must be free, thanks!

[spooked]

11. Wow, more please

Must_Be_Free,

This is a fascinating theory...could you post more about this? Also, would you please share some links to places you visit online? I think you have really hit on something.

[Must_B_Free]

15. here- i wrote it up more

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=606496

[tom_paine]

16. Oh my yes, I think you hit the nail on the head.

And yes they are very angry about the Nazi and Confederate losses.

[Aidoneus]

10. the tide has been turning for every week or two from the last 2 years

I'll believe it when I see results.

[KharmaTrain]

12. Bush's War...Boy Those Wingnuts hate that

You can see the squirming on the right...and yes it's a gradual thing.

First there was the attack on patriotism that has now boiled down to bush-hate and the reference that this is "Bush's War". Well wasn't it he who couldn't wait to play with all those things that go boom? If it ain't WhittleAss' war, then whose it it?

Sure was his war when he strutted on the Abe Lincoln.

[frank frankly]

13. kick

a good posting

[RainDog]

14. frankly frank I agree

...cause it is a good post

so kick

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

17. It sure seems pretty clear doesn't it?

The fact that the Bushs and the Binladens and the Saudi royals have been in business together for so many years should give pause to the most skeptical among us.