Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conason writes in Salon today about blackboxvoting.com and Bev Harris

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:22 PM
Original message
Conason writes in Salon today about blackboxvoting.com and Bev Harris
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2003/10/27/diebold/print.html

Joe Conason's Journal

Why aren't Republicans more disturbed by the threat of computer cheating?

Oct. 27, 2003  |  Newsweek looks into black-box voting

This fall, at every venue I visit to sign books and talk about politics, at least one worried citizen asks whether I believe rogue computer software can steal the next election for the Republicans. Others nod, murmur, and wonder aloud: What can we do about this threat to democracy? Why should we vote or encourage others to vote when the system can be gamed? How do we convince the mainstream media to cover this crucial story?

Web journalists have been probing the real and potential problems of electronic voting most notably on Black Box Voting.org and Black Box Voting.com, the Web sites Bev Harris runs, and in Salon -- but it is true that major media outlets have devoted little attention to the possibility that future elections could be untraceably rigged. Today, Newsweek tech reporter Steven Levy examines that dire prospect in the magazine's Nov. 3 issue. As he explains: "After you punch the buttons to choose your candidates, you may get a final screen that reflects your choices -- but there's no way to tell that those choices are the ones that ultimately get reported in the final tally. You simply have to trust that the software inside the machine is doing its job ... The best minds in the computer-security world contend that the voting terminals can't be trusted."
<>

Bolstering such concerns are the findings of top computer-security experts such as Avi Rubin of Johns Hopkins and David Dill of Stanford. Rubin, who was given a copy of the Diebold voting computers' source code several months ago, has declared its protections against fraud to be worthless. Dill told Newsweek that the risk of a stolen election is "extremely high."

The sickening irony of this situation is that it developed from congressional efforts to preclude another fiasco like Florida 2000. Now Rep. Rush Holt, D.-N.J., has proposed legislation that would require a separate printed record of every computerized vote so that recounts can be audited with a paper trail. But Rep. Bob Ney, the committee chairman, opposes Holt's Voter Confidence Act. Ney happens to be a Republican from Ohio. But why aren't Republicans -- many of whom fret incessantly about "ballot security" in black and Latino neighborhoods -- more disturbed by the threat of computer cheating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is great!
Thanks for posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ney's the Freedom Fries guy, isn't he?
I remember when he was one who wanted the House resolution to change French to Freedom. His office was strange, and they were serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick.
Sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Room101 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bev Harris got mentioned on Greg Palast site
Helping America Vote? by Matthew Pascarella
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=287&row=0


Matthew Pascarella is a student at Marymount Manhattan College in NYC and is a staff researcher for Greg Palast. This article was influenced by the work of investigative journalist Greg Palast and voting experts Bev Harris, Rebecca Mercuri, and Kim Alexander. And oh yeah—the 12th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe the Republicans are running a little behind
on this, but it doesn't seem like it is in the mainstream yet for either party. I have emailed my congressman twice with no response, and he is a liberal Dem. Maybe the Dems don't want to look whiney already when there hasn't even been an election yet. I saw a preview of a local news station that will be running a feature this week, and from the blurb it appears that the story will focus on "could a hacker steal the election" rather than could the government steal the election. I think proponents have sucsessfully spun it in this direction, so that when the public is assured that the machines "are not on the internet" they will accept them as a step in the right direction away from chads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder...
If Freda is so aggressively skeptical about all this BBV stuff, these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC