Vote in Conserv. Paper's Poll where Bush is LOSING BIG!

[Liberator_Rev]

Please take a few secs to add to Bush's grief at www.illinoisleader.com and vote NO (Is Illinois better off with Bush?)
NO is winning 64% to all other options on this Conservative site!

[dolstein]

1. Do you understand what an "unscientific poll" is?

DU'ers can choose to vote in this poll if they want to, but it won't have any bearing on the outcome of the 2004 election. Hell, even scientific polls are pretty meaningless at this point, with the election more than a year away.

[Liberator_Rev]

3. The object isn't to make a scientific point !

It's to wake up Conservative Republicans to the fact that it's possible even for Conservative Republicans like themselves to disapprove of Bush.

When sheeple see a poll of THEIR OWN KIND, it just might open their minds to the possiblity that supporting whistleass was a mistake, one that they may not want to repeat.

[markus]

25. Poll is locked

Says I've already voted, and I've never been to this site before.

[Liberator_Rev]

29. No. It's NOT LOCKED. and now up to 75.93% AGAINST Bush !

[livinontheedge]

32. And the "conservative republicans" believe there is no way

in hell that democrats could be voting in this poll? Really? All these internet polls are totally meaningless. They only serve to bring people to the website so they can get more money from advertisors. Nothing more, nothing less. No one of any intelligence looks at an internet poll, leftie or rightie, and concludes ANYTHING. All you are doing is helping the web site make money.

[damnraddem]

17. If this were a scientific poll, there would be no way to influence it ...

by having DUers 'vote.' Who said it was 'scientific'?

[Wickerman]

2. Damn right it is Conservative! Wow!

Check out the article on the Cali Fires!

http://www.illinoisleader.com/columnists/columnistsview.asp?c=9399

MORRISON: Forest fires: Because they feared the greens
snip--
Homes, lives, property, loss of wildlife and pets -- all because of those who call themselves "environmentalists" and "preservationists."

A federal bill that could eliminate the undergrowth and dead, diseased trees that is causing these fires to burn at excessive temperatures and out of control has been under discussion in Washington, D.C. for months. The bill has passed the U.S. House, but the greens in the Senate won’t let the bill budge.

According to Chuck Cushman of Landrights Association, "Right now, HR 1904, the Healthy Forests Restoration Act is being delayed by the environmental groups who would rather have your house burn down than have foresters clean up the forests or burn a log or a bug-killed tree."


more---

[Liberator_Rev]

6. If people LIKE THIS can give Bush the thumbs down, he's toast !

[LeahMira]

13. Imagine that...

Less than a hundred years ago they were begging people to come to California and even diverting water from hundreds of miles away to turn a natural desert into a place where green lawns and golf courses flourished. Maybe the land isn't meant to support a huge population. Ever think about that?

[RobertSeattle]

4. Slow website

The Bush Eek-onomy must be so lousy in Illionio they can't afford a decent webhost of internet connection. :evilgrin:

[SoFlaJets]

5. just voted

68 against

[Wwagsthedog]

7. LR, some positive spin on your link and others like it

It simply feels good to vote "NO" against bush and his cronies no matter what the forum. Sheeple who view the results, if published, may even have a second, negative thought about the disaster in Washington.

[Liberator_Rev]

8. Is this FUN or what ! 68% disapprove of Bush at Conserv. poll ! Whee!!!

[joanski01]

9. Just voted.

70% NO at this point. And Yes, it makes me feel good to vote against the madmonkey anytime, anywhere.

[w4rma]

10. message deleted n/t

[RebelOne]

11. It told me that I already voted in that poll.

Never been to that site before. Do you think they know I'm from DU?

[damnraddem]

18. It said that I'd already voted ...

but only after I had. It was still strange: I am used to being told that if I try to 'vote' again in an online poll, but not when I simply look at the webpage.

[austinboy]

23. I got the same message...

I wanted to vote too...:grr:

[Liberator_Rev]

31. It will let you vote, if you really haven't.

[Butterflies]

12. It said I had already voted

but I hadn't. Maybe it's going a little too far against bush so it needs to be slowed down. :think:

[billyf65]

15. These folks are crazy...

...though not as much as the freeper nation.

Last year they bickered over the conservative credentials of the GOP Gubernatorial candidate. The guy was pro-life and as a county prosecutor years before, had tried desperately to put a man to death that, while no boy scout, did not commit the murder he'd been convicted of (he's a free man today).

I guess he wasn't pro-life/death enough, because many instead were in favor of a former GOP state legislator-turned libertarian candidate who had allegedly been caught once pleasuring himself in the same room with his infant/toddler child or stepchild.

[Wickerman]

24. Its ok, you just have to view results

odd way to do a poll.

[DemoVet]

14. Hey, I just freeped a conservative poll!

Damn, that felt good, think it was up to 73% when I left.

[damnraddem]

16. Up to 74% no,

after about 500 entries.

[ElementaryPenguin]

19. Done! 74% now saying NO!!!!! Even Repukes hate Chimpy now!

eom

[Barad Simith]

20. done

we are some damn unhappy conservatives here in Illinois

[mobiggsly]

22. polls

My dad(stanch Nebraska republican) was contacted by a republican polling service asking him what he thought of what Bush was doing and he told them he was "not very damn happy" It's pretty hard to be more conservative than my grandpa and hes super pissed at Bush, mostly about Iraq. If these kinds of people are mad at Bush, I think there are cracks in the facade.

[Barad Simith]

26. yup, when we conservative old codgers get unhappy...

...we get damn unhappy

[mitchtv]

21. 75.05 % now

.

[Liberator_Rev]

27. Wow! This is Fabulous ! The Poll appears to be still OPEN !

It's now up to 75.7 DISAPPROVE of Bush.
Ignore the message "You have already voted", if you haven't and try just the same.

[Woodstock]

28. It's still open - I just voted!

No - 75.93%

[Liberator_Rev]

30. 76.79 % are saying Bush has been a disaster for their state!

If you haven't voted see first post for LINK.

[Guaranteed]

33. Hey let's not be too mean to Bush or the GOP

might dump him and then we'd have to go up against someone else.

[Barad Simith]

34. kick.

[Barad Simith]

35. another kick - these guys apparently don't know how to check their traffic