The article below suggests he hasn't. Is the assertion accurate and if so, does anyone know if Dean plans to identify the cuts before Iowa and New Hampshire?
http://www.seacoastonline.com/news/hampton/10282003/news/57644.htm<edit>
During Sunday night’s debate among the Democratic presidential candidates in Detroit, Howard Dean again refused to take key domestic programs off the table for budget-cutting.
As reported in The Washington Post on Monday:
"Divisions over Iraq highlighted the 90-minute debate among the nine Democrats and overshadowed differences on the economy and other domestic issues that also emerged, particularly whether former Vermont governor Howard Dean would cut federal entitlements programs to help reduce the budget deficit.
"On domestic issues, the sharpest exchange came over whether Dean would consider cutting Medicare, Medicaid or other entitlement programs to help balance the budget. He said none of the three is ‘on the table.’
"Kerry, noting that Dean had said earlier he would consider cutting some entitlement programs, shot back, ‘If he just took Social Security and Medicare off the table, the question is what entitlements are on the table? Veterans’ pensions, food stamps, Medicaid, Social - disability? He can’t answer that question.’"
Just last week, Dean told the Des Moines Register that he "favors balancing the federal budget in part by limiting growth of entitlement programs." Dean said, "We’re going to have to limit the growth of entitlement programs." (Beaumont, Des Moines Register, 10/19/03)
more...