Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right Wing Caller On C-Span

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:48 AM
Original message
Right Wing Caller On C-Span
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 08:49 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
says the culture will get so "bad" that traditional marriage will become a minority......

YIKES!!!!!!!

Does that mean that we will all be gay or that most of us will be gay?

That is the assertion emobodied in his statement...

I don't see the nexus between recognizing or tolerating a behavior and encouraging it...

Does anybody think in light of the recent Supreme Court decision on sodomy that men and women automatically eschewed their heterosexuality and embraced homosexuality?

John Stuart Mill was right.... "The Conservative party (insert Republicans) are the stupid party...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah I saw that
I was just "uhhhhhh"

and now they are talking about abortion. That's going to get even more impassioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's C-Span
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. This will lead to Senator on dog sex, but only in Pennsylvania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. *SNORT*
Well, there goes my tea through my nose. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. hahahaha however I shouldn't be laughing he is my senator..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. And the "Single Bullet Theory" takes on a brand new meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Would someone care to enlighten me?
What the hell are you people talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Senator Santorum's comments on the Supreme Court case
striking down the Texas homosexual sodomy law.
. . .

SANTORUM: We have laws in states, like the one at the Supreme Court right now, that has sodomy laws and they were there for a purpose. . . .

Every society in the history of man has upheld the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman. Why? Because society is based on one thing: that society is based on the future of the society. And that's what? Children. Monogamous relationships. In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality _

AP: I'm sorry, I didn't think I was going to talk about "man on dog" with a United States senator, it's sort of freaking me out.

. . .
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/04/22/national1737EDT0668.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. These are the same people ...
who are against gays marrying because it will PROMOTE promiscuity. I'm still waiting for an explanation on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reachout Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think...
because of the increased media attention to gay culture I may be turning metrosexual. Does that count?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Metrosexual?
You're hot for the Paris subway system? Or maybe Washington's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think the caller is also complaining that people DON'T get married
Being single all your life in the large metropolitan, northern city is no big deal, but in the mid and south west, you're probably considered a little weird. "normal" people get hitched and have 2.35 kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. screw normal
Who'd want to be that anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes
Yes, I will admit that as soon as the Supreme Court announced the sodomy decision, I dumped my wife and new born daughter, and I have hooked up with a new gay lover every day and am hoping to recruit these gay lovers all into the military and into the schools to persuade all the young males to become gay in the future.

(I hope people realize I'm being sarcastic...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You too?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've wondered this for a long time.
What exactly do conservatives find so threatening about long-term, committed same-sex relationships?

Do they feel like their own sexual identity is so vulnerable? Like Jerry Seinfeld once said, because they know how low their sales resistance is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. maybe they are afraid...
They are worried that these gay couples might breed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Traditional Marrige" constitues a minor part...
...of all marraiges already. It's been this way since the 60's and possibly as far back as the mid-50's. Traditional being one man, one woman, man works, woman keeps house, "until death do us part", et.al.

That battle was lost a long time ago. The question now is really more of a question of where the new lines will end up being. I know what I would like to see. I can guarentee that it would pretty much piss off everyone but a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. We could all be 'bi'...
I'd sleep with a woman if I were really attracted to her--and though I consider myself hetero, I've had a couple crushes on women in my lifetime. I think most people could swing either way if the opportunity or desire arose. Sexuality should be something to be explored (with a consenting being, of course), not put in a boring little conservative box. I always look askew at those who denounce 'fags'--because in my personal experience, they are usually the first to secretly proposition your gay male friend, LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I think this scares them
Britanny must be driving these guys (and gals) crazy.

She is doing this whole gay/bi seduction thing with Madonna and they don't want to be turned on by it. But lo and behold, they can't get to sleep without thinking about... but it's so wrong.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. When the divorce rate is 50%
I think we should hope that traditional marriage will become a minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. Conservatives probably think that same-sex unions will probably
breed more, overrunning the population!

You see, though, there's a logistical problem - especially funny when you realize that they always point out that Marriage was instituted for having children! guess you can't have a marriage without having children!!

Sad, though, that many marriages started with the firstborn attending in utero at the ceremony. Especially at "family values" conservative weddings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. He means the good old fashioned, "beat your wife, drink some
booze, and fall asleep on the couch" brand of traditional marriage. Yeah, we were once a traditional country... *sob, sob*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. My marriage is certainly not threatened...
I don't get the argument from the right that the institution of marriage will be threatened if gays are allowed to marry...
Gee, their (the conservatives') relationships must be on truly shaky ground...
How on EARTH does another couple wanting a lifetime of faithful commitment to one another threaten MY marriage???
Seems to me that gay couples who want to wed are validating marriage, not threatening it...
Yikes, stupidity is horrifying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC