Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this true?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fencesitter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:40 PM
Original message
Is this true?
An old friend of mine who I reconnected with last year sent me this thing. I had forgotten she had a right wing background, but now she sends me all sorts of RW gooberwash that I usually debunk. What about this one? Note Senators Byrd and Bradley are used as examples for spin.

2004 Election Issue!! This must be an issue in "2004". Please! Keep it going.

----------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY:

(This is worth reading. It is short and to the point.)

Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.

Our Senators and Congresswomen do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it.

You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own

benefit plan.

In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.

For all practical purposes their plan works like this:

When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die.

Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments.

For example, former Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives.

This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.

Younger Dignitaries who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives.

Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. NADA....ZILCH....

This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;

"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"!

From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, -every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer)- we can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month after retirement.

Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!

Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.

That change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us ... then sit back and watch how fast they would fix it.

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve.

How many people can YOU send this to?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. So only democrat politicians get the benefits of PERS? GOP politicians
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 02:44 PM by radwriter0555
don't?

DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS.

Sorry, but what's your point in bringing this up? Are you unable to verify whether or not this is true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope--go to snopes.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/pensions.htm

This one's been going around for a long while. I've seen it a bunch of times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. so what does Strom's widow receive?
I have no idea if this is accurate, but find the selective 'choosing' of examples rather interesting. No mention of how much Sen. Helms is costing the tax payers. No citing of Lott? Wonder how much ole' Dick Army is raking in. I bet that Senator Enron Graham isn't doing to poorly down in his Texan retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC