|
>Nowadays, it's common to see the mantra- show us the fat. I've read this several times lately. We've cut and cut and cut. They are down to some crappy choices, all of which involve real people being hurt. Some dems in our state are telling the anti-tax people to show us the fat. It's been cut, people.<
You know, I had to laugh today. I didn't do it to the person's face, but I was dangerously close.
We're one of the lucky ones -- we had enough cash in reserve (thank GOD for those who have the spine to put a bit away,) to pay off the deficits for the next three years. In that length of time, we'll be figuring out what to do in Year Four, while we're staring down the barrel of a six-figure shortfall. We have told, and told, and TOLD our citizens that we have NO extra cash. NONE. Nada. Zip. We have to have 90 days of operating expenses on hand at all times, by state law. It cannot be touched.
Regardless of our explanations, regardless of graphs, charts, Excel spreadsheets, whatever, we STILL have people who think that we can simply write a check for whatever program they just can't live without. I'm not talking a soup kitchen, senior citizens assistance, or even some type of job posting thing (Washington state's unemployment rate is still above the national average.) I'm talking the frills. We'd like funding for the arts. We'd like a new park, to add to the five parks already within our city limits. At this point, though, WE DON'T HAVE IT. I don't know how to explain this any more clearly to any of these people, besides grabbing them by the shirt front, and asking them how they like their $30 car tabs.
If we had extra money, by God, I'd find a way to spend it to aid some of those real people you mentioned. I'd beg and borrow whatever I could to help those who are unemployed, like our next door neighbor, who's been out of work for a year. DH and I are lucky; we can contribute to the local food bank and social services folks, so we do. The arts are important. So are parks. So is a community swimming pool. At the same time, the most important thing (to me,) is not handing a metric buttload of new taxes to our neighbors with the four kids across the street, because I funded everything on the face of the planet. It's really important to me that I look these people in the face and tell them that I did what I could to make sure that the city is not mired in debt for the next 20 years.
>I don't know if there is any way to outright stop him. Your state may be in a better position to fend off his anti-tax ways, if only because the economy sucks so much right now.<
I thought his getting busted for embezzling money from his supporters would do it. It didn't. Eyman is well-funded. He's being used by the Republican Party to get "a foothold" in Washington state.
I'm only sad that Ahhhhhnold didn't hire Eyman to be his new chief of staff. I'd be willing to contribute to his travel expenses, as long as he promises to never, ever live in Washington state again.
Julie
|