|
Edited on Fri Oct-31-03 01:55 PM by belle
I think it would have to be based on different fundamental assumptions than the ones we have.
The assumption that that everything in the universe is somehow alive and connected, for instance, instead of the belief (explicit or implicit) that most of us have: that the universe is a dead and/or hostile place, and we are (as a species and as individuals) alone in it.
It would have to be based on the knowledge that sex in all its manifest forms is generally a good and healthy thing, as it is a manifestation of the life force.
It would have to value exploration of the inner worlds (psychology, dreams, mysticism) at least as much as the material world. At the same time, the understanding that the material world isn't bad or "fallen" in and of itself; we're here for a purpose. Sensuality is a good thing: good food, good music, good sex...
It would treat art in all its forms as an essential part of living, not as a highly specialized filed that only an elite few can afford to patronize and fewer can create.
It would hold "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" damn near sacrocanct. Likewise freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom to assemble.
It would include other rights among the basic ones that are "self-evident:" the right to be able to eat, put a roof over one's head, maintain a family (whatever that means to you), go to the doctor, get a decent education, and enjoy at least a modest amount of leisure time without having to sacrifice your body, soul, or mental health.
It would seriously question why any one person would need more money than she or he literally knew what to do with.
It would never allow a corporate entity to attain "personhood" status.
It would value plain human curiousity--about other people, about other countries, about the way the world actually works--rather than clinging to the notion of being Number One! It would value diplomacy, and understand the difference between "dilpmoatic" and "caving in out of cowardice."
It would require that a leader at least be able to find a country on a map of the world and name its capital, imports, exports, and be able to talk about some of its history, before being allowed to attack it. A basic understanding of military strategy, or at least chess, would also be good.
Those are starters, anyway.
|