McCain on C-Span-2 Trying to twist the Dems statements about
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 11:55 AM
Original message |
McCain on C-Span-2 Trying to twist the Dems statements about |
|
not being able to ask question from Bush!!!!
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
1. The rep from Michigan Stabenow introduced an amendment |
|
to deal with the problem with Bush's trying to restrict access to the WH. Now McCain wants to put "Constitutionally correct" or something like that into the amendment.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Dorgan on now: when the WH requests money we give it to them |
|
but now they want to prevent the Congress to ask where the money is going?
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Congressmen have the RESPONSIBILITY to their |
|
constituents to explain how money is spent.
|
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
1songbird
(642 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. "Constitutionally Correct" or inquiries that repugs deem correct |
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How could we ever have thought that McCain is a reasonable individual |
|
despite being a Repug? I am amazed at how they can get aligned behind any stupid idea proposed by *.
|
cosmicdot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. personally, I never bought into the McCain thing |
|
don't like him dont' trust him he's 100%+ Repuke
felt for him in the 2000 South Carolina primary
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Dorgan now talking about the Judge appointments row. |
|
Earlier in the day I saw another Democrat mentioning that the Repugs want to spend time--11 hours discussing the judicial nominees who have been rejected (I might not have the exact statement) instead of discussing legislation. He suggested that the Democrats can spend 22 hours discussing the APPROVED * judicial nominees.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
8. McCain again. Talking about appropriations and I don't understand |
|
exactly what he is saying. Basically, that since the Congress already approved the appropriations they don't have the right to question? I really might be totally confused???? Luke airforce base????? Help! I am lost.
|
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-07-03 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Letter from citizens against government waste brought up by McCain |
|
now. I guess the letter is defending McCain....
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.