|
Personally I like Kerry. I think he has a hell of a career in public service and a great background fighting for liberal causes. IMO, he'd make the best president of those running.
I also don't really have any real substantive problems with Dean. He has some interesting ideas. He has brought great enthusiasm and energy to this election and I like how he's raised much of the money.
I do however see a hint of that elite Northeastern born and educated mentality to both of them. Dean seems somewhat awkward and somewhat clueless about the south, while Kerry often doesn't speak to the point... Note, I'm not ripping on them, but I don't see either of them connecting very well with voters in the rural areas, and working class neighborhoods. Dean and Kerry will do well with upscale liberal voters and upper middle class whites in wealthier suburbs, and Dean might be able to draw some Nader voters into the dem. fold.
Yet, I don't see this as being enough to beat Bush in states where it really does count (and I'm not going to include Florida because of the Jeb Bush political machinery/chicanery/thievery in that state) -- states such as WV, Pa, Oh, and perhaps Nevada and Arizona. This is not to mention the great lakes states of Minnessota and Wisconsin, which we must hold on to, if we realistically wish to win.
I think Edwards has a great economic message, which I hope other democrats will adopt. He has had some of the sharpest and most compelling arguments against this administration's economic policies and calls crony capitalism for what it is. Clark has a great resume, and seems capable of drawing in McCain type independants in larger numbers than anyone else, partly because of his military background and partly because he DOESN'T have any traditional political experience.
Now, obviously we have enough time left, where we may see Dean more at ease, espousing a more optimistic tone, and Kerry able to give more straightforward contrite answers. Personally I don't mind the nuanced arguments, as it has shown Kerry's knowledge about the various issues at hand , but as the IWR vote has shown, many people are turned off by complex, and somewhat convoluted reasoning.
Al Gore obviously had some trouble connecting with people, as people thought he was too mean during the debates. I think a lot of anger rarely helps in a general election. We need a hopeful and optimistic message, which I believed is embodied best by Edwards and Clark.
|