|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 08:55 AM Original message |
My Take On The Flag Burning Amendment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FunBobbyMucha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
1. I wholly agree, but my question has always been... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. Could you explain something please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I Believe It Prohibited All Cross Burning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Hmm. That surprises me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Intent is the deciding factor on cross burnings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Here's a link for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Right ... "with the intent to intimidate." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Thanks. That makes sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Clarence Thomas Wrote The Majority Opinion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumptheshadow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. If I remember correctly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. My advice to liberals would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HootieMcBoob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. or why not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Hootie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Actually, I think it would be approved by states very quickly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's not about flag BURNING, it's about flag DESECRATION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brian Sweat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 09:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. No, it about expressing a view that offends other people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:20 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Really? It criminalises expressing views that offend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scott Lee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 02:22 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. If offense wasn't involved, why would it be an issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 06:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. But the language isn't about offending, the language is about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
18. My take is: who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leanstreets23 (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-12-03 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
20. Always the 'regressives', distinguishing themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Sep 20th 2024, 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC