Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Check out this FR Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:13 PM
Original message
Check out this FR Thread
Interesting - I don't see any rah-rah's or flag waving
only complete denial....


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1025688/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Denial is right!
Edited on Thu Nov-20-03 12:16 PM by eileen_d
Right now I'm more fearful of Michael Jackson than the draft board.

Well, at least we know this freeper's been downing their daily dose of cable "news" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysimdnwyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well this explains a lot:
"...what was the Clinton response to the political embarrassment in August 1998 because he had been caught telling absolutely perjurious testimony about Monica Lewinsky? Ultimately it lead to September 11, 2001." - post #6 by Harris


So Clinton having an affair is responsible for 9/11. No wonder the freepers hate him so much! :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Freepers need a legal lesson
"telling absolutely perjurious testimony"

Clinton told a lie. He didn't commit perjury. The difference is not semantics put a legal definition. A lie in context to testimony that would have no bearing on a case is not perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. War mongers wont go
Thats so typical of right wingers. They love wars but they dont want to fight in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone should search old FP threads for Clinton Era "Overextended" crap
It was RW mantra during the late 90's that Clinton had "overextended" the US Military with Peace Keeping missions, etc. Clinton's deployments are childs play compared to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL
Who got in there and said "General Rove"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. They'll Leave The Repukes When Their Children Get Drafted
hypocrits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. The freeps are not very enthused about their kids getting drafted
Wonder why that is?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yea I noticed
this thread died a very quick death. Somehow they don't think any of their kids will be going apparently. And NOBODY was for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. SUPER DUCK
How many of you would support a draft if it came to that...

I would only support a draft if our volunteer numbers dropped to a dangerously low level.

...or would you enlist or encourage your children to enlist?

All males are already required to register by law. This has been true for 30+ years.











That's called registering, not enlisting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC