Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's friend Janklow will walk free-- GOP justice.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 03:55 PM
Original message
Bush's friend Janklow will walk free-- GOP justice.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=584&e=4&u=/nm/20031201/pl_nm/people_janklow_dc

Moody County Circuit Court Judge Rodney Steele has ruled out the presentation of Janklow's publicly documented abysmal driving record or his making light in speeches of his penchant for speeding. However, Steele will permit the testimony of a woman who claims her pickup truck was struck by Janklow's vehicle at the same intersection a year earlier. Janklow's defense may focus on his diabetic condition and a possible adverse reaction to his not eating enough that day that could have led to the accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. One way or another...
He's still a murderer! :mad:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this news will make the people of his state realize that Janklow
is getting "special" treatment and even if he does get off or gets a lesser sentence, they should start a recall on his butt NOW!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. How the Hell can they disallow testimony regarding his prior
driving record??? Can you spell K-A-N-G-A-R-O-O justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I can spell Imperial Amerika.
Imperial Family allies are above the law.

Janklow will go FREE FREE FREE (though I have to admit, the word "free" has lost so much of it's meaning since the Death of the Old Republic).

It's as certain as Hitler's or Saddam's "re-election".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Actually, this is not unusual
The judge has probably ruled that the prejudicial effect of his prior driving record outweighs its probative value in a particular instance. He's not on trial for his prior driving record. Apparently though the significance of a prior act in the same location was regarded as more relevant and was ruled admissable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I heard a report on the local news
that sounded like the judge may allow the past driving record in if Janklow tries to claim that the cause of this accident had something to do with his diabetes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. heavy sigh
I have never put myself up for flaming, but here goes...

what is the difference between this and Ted Kennedy and Mary Jo Kopechne(sp?)

Please don't hurt me, but they seem similar, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Refresh my mind please . .
. . was Kennedy accused of breaking any laws (like speeding or reckless driving) that resulted in Kopechne's death? I mean real accusations by a prosecutor that might have a chance to hold up in court - not accusations from RW zealots.


I don't remember any myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. involuntary manslaughter?
I hate hypocrisy anywhere it occurs.

Janklow blows through an intersection, hits a motorcyclist, who is killed.

Kennedy wrecks his car into a creek/river, and the passenger is killed.

Neither one meant to, but they both did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. A bit off the mark...
it's only similar if Kennedy went off the bridge on purpose. As Jank-off often blew off the stop sign *on purpose*, your analogy only holds up if you can cite instances of Kennedy repeatedly driving off bridges intentionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You're getting ahead of yourself.
Janklow broke the law by running a stop sign, and killed someone.

Kennedy wrecked his car, and killed someone. Was he ever charged with a moving violation w.r.t. the accident? Had he run a stop sign, was he driving recklessly, etc.? I honestly don't know. If that's the case, then yes it would be hypocritical of someone who supported Kennedy to denounce Janklow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. All I can find
is rightwing hate Ted Kennedy web sites, so I can't even find factual information, just biased info, but no, he wasn't charged with a moving violation w.r.t. the accident.

I still wonder about not reporting the accident until the next morning.

Oh well, Janklow won't get reelected, and he will get off with only some type of community service.

Now, if it was me OTOH, I would be rotting in jail as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. All I can find
is rightwing hate Ted Kennedy web sites, so I can't even find factual information, just biased info, but no, he wasn't charged with a moving violation w.r.t. the accident.

I still wonder about not reporting the accident until the next morning.

Oh well, Janklow won't get reelected, and he will get off with only some type of community service.

Now, if it was me OTOH, I would be rotting in jail as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. I think he was charged with leaving the scene,
pleaded guilty and did lose his license for a while (I'm working from memory here so don't assume I have my facts straight)

Not that Kennedy's actions are defensible, but one difference is that DWI was not taken particularily seriously in 1969 by anyone. People were pretty cavilier about DWI until MADD finally got us to wake up. I know someone who killed a friend (his passenger) while driving drunk in the early '70's. He did get charged with careless driving, paid a fine and lost his license for 6 months. Not much of a punishment for causing someone's death and, this guy had no political connections.

I'm not saying it was right, it's just how it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. The first and primary difference
is that Ted Kennedy did not kill Mary Jo, Mary Sue, and Mary Jane.
It was one big assed mistake. Janklow has a driving record like Berlin had a bombing record, big, ugly, and repeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Amazing that you compare these two situations.
Why didn't you compare it with Laura Bush running the stop sign and how she killed someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Last time
I tried to take a violation to trial. (red light, I entered on green to yellow) The DA offers to knock down points but conviction stands. I refuse. 3rd appearance- issuing officer no shows with note, I petition for dismissal(usually automaic in california). Judge looks at record( 3 movers in 5 years) says to me there's no way I'll dismiss this with your record.(gallery gasps) I explain I'd be held in contempt if I no showed, and this is my 3rd appearance on the matter. He doesnt relent(more gasps).

obviously the judge had made up his mind , I settle for points deferment as a reschedule would be a waste of more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. the latest i read said...
that if there is a medical condition defense then the judge might allow presentation of his driving record.

but i doubt he will get any real punishment at all. not like if it was one of us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Regardless of whether past record allowed to be entered
Medical excuse does not justify killing people. What they offered as an excuse was knowledge of a pre-existing condition. If it is pre-existing then it would be his reponsibility to maintain any prescription as ordered by medical authorities. Pre-existing condition not kept under control would be no different from driving while drunk. Both are performed knowing that driving under those conditions may(will) be dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Exactamundo!
His pathetic excuse actually bolsters the prosecution's case. He KNEW he had the condition, and drove anyway. The whole record of speeding tickets, etc., probably is excessively prejudicial and if I were the defense attorney, I'd try to keep it out too. That won't matter. How many people (potential jurors) in the state don't know about his infamous driving record anyway?

Bake, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. He won't be re-elected
not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Ha! nothing that happens to people happens to Repugs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Hell with his record he would be a good Republican candidate
The more laws broken the higher in esteem they will hold him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adjoran Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kennedy was convicted
of leaving the scene of an accident, received a two-month suspended sentence and a year's probation, paid a fine and had his driver's license suspended for a year. He has never applied for it to be reinstated.

Janklow's driving record would be admissible before sentencing, but the law prohibits the introduction of "prior bad acts," including convictions, in the guilt phase of a trial, as being unduly prejudicial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mioshi Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. What's the connection?
Perhaps I suffer too much from a logical mind. Please explain how Janklow's case has ANYTHING to do with dubya and the GOP. I really want to know. Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Hi Mioshi!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I'll try: Friend of Bush + GOP influence + political power= no conviction
Note that his history of many speeding tickets and accidents are sealed and prosecutor can't refer to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. ah, amerika, were he an 18 year old black man, ...4 years in the pen.
say it,
say it loud,
say it proud,
its great to be white in amerika!!

(especially if you have the money for good lawyers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhosNext Donating Member (315 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Janklow is a fat piece of garbage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Division Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Politically he's toast: Only 7% want him for reelection...
Edited on Mon Dec-01-03 08:16 PM by darkblue
and his approval rating is 29% with a 45% unfavorable.

Link: http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1021183&t=Nation+%2F+World&c=26,1021183

Edited to add:
I'd say this also makes him the perfect candidate for Bush to appoint to the Department of Transportation, given Bush's record with appointments. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC