|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:06 PM Original message |
Poll question: Would you vote for Nader in 2004?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hmmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KCDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. hm, that many for Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I think it's the anti-anti-Nader vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. Wait, the Greens aren't even endorsing him, are they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:13 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU_Pushed_Me_Away (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Grrr. The Nader factor! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
5. can't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Start your own poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Deleted message |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. yeah but he's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. He? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. The Electoral College is slanted in favor of a 2-party system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pasadenaboy (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. I totally agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeahMira (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 08:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
31. They are, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shamanstar (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. voting for nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. yes,telling people to shut up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minkyboodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. what a lovely poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pasadenaboy (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. a vote for St. Ralph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cryofan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. I will probably vote Nader unless Kucinich is on the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I'd vote for Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
19. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark Can WIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
20. You didn't have an option for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-03 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. No option for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeveneightyWhoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
24. If he truly runs in 04.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 05:57 AM Response to Original message |
25. Where's the Green candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
26. you need another option, sgr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 07:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
29. No way in HELL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
30. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
32. I learned my lesson in 2000. Yes, I voted for Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ignatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-02-03 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
33. Nope, I won't waste my vote(assuming it even gets counted) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC