Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why doesn't Ralph Nader ever run as a democrat?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:53 PM
Original message
So why doesn't Ralph Nader ever run as a democrat?
it's hard to think of any reason besides attention seeking for anyone to run as a third party knowing he will help install Bush* again.

Anyone who helps install * is a real scumbag.

Why doesn't Ralph just run as a democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-02-03 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. He would have to file financial disclosures.
Which he won't do since that would spell the end of his support--even from his 'bots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. KLATUU BARADA NADER
he wasn't required to disclose finances due to the nature of the status of the Green party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Apparently the Greens didn't make him do it.
it's a matter of course for every democratic candidate I'm aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. What does this mean?
"he wasn't required to disclose finances due to the nature of the status of the Green party"

I don't understand what this means.

And what does it matter whether it is required. If he's running for President, and taking himself seriously (both are true), then he should release financial records regardless of whether he legally must or not.

I really do not understand your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yes, but what did you mean
What does it matter whether Nader was required to disclose financial information or not? If he is a serious person running for President, he should in any case.

You dodged the question in the first instance, and are ignoring it in the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
47. Why don't you respond to the core question of the post?
I am very interested in hearing your thoughts as to why he doesn't run from the inside. He apparently has the most "democratic" message...so why not run in the Democratic primaries?

Or is it that his ego is more suited to general elections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Yeah
You mean, the mutual fund portfolio that owns stocks in such great corporate citizens such as:

Wal-Mart
Microsoft
The Altria Group (Formerly Known as Philip Morris)
Clear Channel Communications
Exxon Mobil

and other great companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But that would make him a hypocrite wouldn't it
you're not saying he's a hypocrite are you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You figure it out
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. They don't call him Fidelity Ralph for nothing...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. good God
will you children please go to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL
Couldn't have put it better myself. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because the blood of our soldiers
is, in his mind, a small price to pay for the stoking of his vanity.

Because, perhaps, he has a small group of rabid followers who disconnect their politics from reality, and are happy to wreak hell if let's them think that they're lurching towards heaven.

Because Greens have confused "Strength from Diversity" with "Strength from Division."

Because Greens think their tender consciences--which may never be called into question--are more important than making sure thousands of soldiers aren't shot in the face, tens of thousands of civilians aren't killed, old people aren't left to suffer and shit in their beds unaided, children aren't left with rotten teachers and a desparate future.

Because Greens never make the connection between those horrid realities and their individual vote.

Because Greens indulge in sophistry to simultaneously pretend that they must vote Green so that their vote will matter, and that since the Democrats often lose for many reasons, that their vote does not matter.

Because Greens cannot help but revel in sophistry, since they follow the master sophist himself: Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MIMStigator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. oh I see.
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Can you think of a better explanation
I think that sums it up. Naderism is the marriage of toddlerhood and politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. What a great post
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Best Nader post........ ever
Mix in his financial holdings and there can be no reply of the Nadophiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. they cannot all be this stupid,T
or can they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. The superior wisdom of the deluded
Sorry, always forget about that. While I'm plodding with slow rationality, I must remember to defer to the wrong.

There is a political reality attached to my votes and my activism. Doing one thing makes outcome X that much more likely; doing another thing makes outcome X that much less likely.

Voting for the Greens makes imperial war and domestic misery and failure that much more likely, for not only does it deny Democrats power, but it sows divisions within the factions of the Democratic party.

"Voting your conscience"--whatever the (in)validity of the reasonings that got one here--is totally obscene in the face of stupid war and carnage and misery.

Are you voting to make yourself feel better, or to make the nation and world a better place--or at least to preserve them from both regressing yet further?

The stakes are high. This is the choice. There is no other choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I see the truth hurts you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Ask not for whom the fortune cookie cracks
for it cracks for you.

Any other deep responses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. you first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
41. you can insult me all day
I'm not alone, and I'm not impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
35. Ralph Nader started the war in Iraq
by choosing to elect Bush. Ralph has blood on his hands, and so does every damn Green who still supports him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. blah blah blah, Jack
you've sounded the same tune yourself over and over

what is it you don't understand about what Al From said: The assertion that Nader's marginal vote hurt Gore is not borne out by polling data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. But the Dems who voted for the damn war are heroes,eh Jack?
fucking sad.Try your demogoguery on people who give a shit about phony ass platitudes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. With Al Gore President, do you think there would have ever been an IWR?
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 05:41 AM by Old and In the Way
Be honest now.

I love it that the Nader folks, when trapped, resort to, "well this Democrat said Ralph didn't spoil the election." I'm hearing that from lot's of Bush apologists you are taking out of context sentences from Bill Clinton's speeches to justify the current mess in Iraq...very similar argument.

I really don't want to argue 2000 politics, who could possibly have believed that this country could get so FU'd in 3 years. Heck, I'll bet most Nader voters would happily change their vote if it were possible....that's hindsight.

But if Ralph chooses to run another campaign in 2004, he is doing it as part of the strategy to help Republicans maintain control. As such, he's free to be the purest sounding Democrat there is in an effort to drain the idealistic, but sadly, naive, far left Democrats who could spell the difference in this election.

But none of you guys are answering the question asked in the thread: Why isn't Ralph running as a Democrat in the primaries if he believes he is the best Democrat to represent America?

Would one of you people in the Nader fan club please give us insight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. No I dont
I just think the vitriol and hatred directed at Nader is far too disproportionate to the hatred that should be directed at the real culprits that put Bush in place,the Supreme Court.

Nader was one of many factors,including the purged voters, the intimidated voters,the Dems who voted Bush,the lack of a real recount and on and on.But it seems like people focus their hatred on Nader at the exclusion of the other,even more glaring reasons why Bush sits in the White House.It is misdirected rage,and it's childish,unproductive,pointless and undemocratic at it's heart.

It doesn't matter how many votes anyone got because THEY WERE NEVER COUNTED.The entire argument should be moot after this fact.The true blame lies at the feet of those who decided the votes don't matter,not those who choose to participate in democracy.I simply will not damn a person for doing what we're told from day one in school that anyone can do in this country.Democracy doesn't mean running only when it's safe for one party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
50. outrageous, irresponsible, false
This apologia for electoral fraud and illegal war is really beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
37. I have
written worse non-comprehensible capital letter diatribes, your not going to get kicked but anyway keep up the good fight:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. hey now
don't get on my bad side...I thought my diatribe quite correct ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Actually
I meant "my non-comprehensible diatribes" yours are pretty well structured:):).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Thank you Han Christian Anderson
When you stop patting yourself on the back for your brilliantly falacious characterisation of those who have more moral courage, better vision and far more truth to their positions than you just demonstrated you can start to read and learn who the greens really are.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Moral Courage, please
Maybe if they stopped acting like Marxist freaks they would receive more respect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
46. greens as marxists?
greens are capitalists.

why do you insist on exposing how little you know about anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. Thank you for your pretty words
Right now people are being shot in the face, old people are being denying decent retirements, the federal debt is set to explode, and the Right marches on.

And you pat yourself on the back, no doubt for possessing some superior wisdom that we Cynics on Earth cannot be privy to.

I apologize. I defer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because he wouldn't get any votes?
:shrug:

I wouldn't vote for him. I feel for the Green party, but I surely wouldn't vote for him. He's even more of a robot than Al Gore appeared to be during Election 2000...

As for Ralphie helpin' out Bushie*, that's all conjecture and bullshit until I see some actual proof. :D Besides, Jebbie and Kathie did far more to help install *, or haven't people grasped that simple concept by now? Michael Moore did a nice job at doing so, but oh wait, he's supported the Greens so he must obviously want * to be in power too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. That's the weird part of the Nader argument
Nader says the Democratic Party doesn't support people like him who are supposedly super-left and Democratic voters are disenfranchised because of it. Well ok, participate in a primary and let those disenfranchised voters lead you to the promised land. Unfortunately, he won't do that because the purpose is more about ego-stroking than actual idealism. Case in point, where was NAder during the Florida election fiasco? No where near Florida, I'll tell you that much.

He cares about this much, " ", for voters or for peoples rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. and just what has the Democratic party done for voter rights since 2000?
OH YEAH!!! "Get over it." I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. because he thinks he can start a green movement
by destorying the dems and after the repuglicans destroy america, we will beg the greens to take over.
he is seriously deluded. america ain't that smart or that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. what a wonderful sentiment! America not that smart nor that stupid
but, apparently, you are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
38. What is the reality?
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 12:59 AM by FDRrocks
I mean, seriously. Kucinich is marginalized in the Democratic party and he is a liberal.

Why be a marginal person in the Democratic party when he can he can be Independant and run as the Green (Liberal) party contender. An international party with strongholds in Europe.

You guys scoff at Kucinich but fret over Ralph... what does that say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
51. heh - good point
You guys scoff at Kucinich but fret over Ralph... what does that say?

It says that progressives are safe to play with as long as they can be neutered after the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
52. I am locking this thread.
From the GD posting rules:

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

This is inflammatory.


NYer99
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC