|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
MIMStigator
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-03 11:53 PM Original message |
So why doesn't Ralph Nader ever run as a democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-03 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. He would have to file financial disclosures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. KLATUU BARADA NADER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Apparently the Greens didn't make him do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. What does this mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:23 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:28 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Deleted message |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:31 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yes, but what did you mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Deleted message |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 05:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
47. Why don't you respond to the core question of the post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMStigator
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:08 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. But that would make him a hypocrite wouldn't it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. You figure it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SahaleArm
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
29. They don't call him Fidelity Ralph for nothing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. good God |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paragon
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. Because the blood of our soldiers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMStigator
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:03 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. oh I see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Can you think of a better explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:05 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. What a great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:24 AM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Best Nader post........ ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Deleted message |
Ardee
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:28 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. they cannot all be this stupid,T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. The superior wisdom of the deluded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:30 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:36 AM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Deleted message |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:46 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I see the truth hurts you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:47 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Ask not for whom the fortune cookie cracks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:53 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. you first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:20 AM Response to Reply #31 |
42. Deleted message |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. you can insult me all day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackSwift
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:52 AM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Ralph Nader started the war in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:16 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. blah blah blah, Jack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
44. But the Dems who voted for the damn war are heroes,eh Jack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 05:35 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. With Al Gore President, do you think there would have ever been an IWR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 06:00 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. No I dont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 06:31 AM Response to Reply #35 |
50. outrageous, irresponsible, false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
messiah
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
37. I have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:21 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. hey now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
messiah
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:32 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ardee
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Thank you Han Christian Anderson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:35 AM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Moral Courage, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
46. greens as marxists? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyBrandt
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:38 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. Thank you for your pretty words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
6. Because he wouldn't get any votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
20. That's the weird part of the Nader argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM Response to Reply #20 |
40. and just what has the Democratic party done for voter rights since 2000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pansypoo53219
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
17. because he thinks he can start a green movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:27 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. what a wonderful sentiment! America not that smart nor that stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FDRrocks
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
38. What is the reality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 06:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
51. heh - good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99
![]() |
Wed Dec-03-03 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
52. I am locking this thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC