Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vote for Newsom DEMOCRATS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:06 AM
Original message
Vote for Newsom DEMOCRATS
SF mayor- DEMOCRATIC candidate!

Why would you vote for another party if you are a DEMOCRAT?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. SF Mayor
If Gonzalez wins that's one thing, but I will pissed as hell if he works to deliver votes to the Green presidential nominee and throws California to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanLiberal Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. California...?
California is really worrying me. In the last election, if you add up Schwarzenegger's votes and McClintock's votes, that's a 64% landslide. Those Texas electricity manipulators must have been laughing their pants off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. What should really be worrying you is that our votes weren't even counted
before Ceasar was crowned in California.

It is common for us to vote in private homes, schools, libraries etc using paper ballots.

I had barely cast my vote (last minutes as always) when I turned on the radio less than 5 minutes after casting my vote to hear that Arnold had won.

Things that make you go hmmmmmm!

Flashback to 2000

----

<snip>

Yes. Something very strange happened in Volusia County on election night November 2000, the night that first Gore won Florida, then Bush, and then as everybody can so well remember there was a tie.

Something strange indeed. But what exactly? In the above report ( click for full version), written days after the election, hotshot Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank goes on to attribute the strange 16,022 negative vote tally from Volusia's precinct 216 to an apparently innocent cause.

"…. faulty 'memory cards' in the machines caused the 16,000-vote disappearance on election night. The glitch was soon fixed," he wrote.

But thanks to recent investigations into Black Box Voting by Washington State writer Bev Harris we now know this explanation is not correct. In fact it is not even in the ballpark.

<snip>

In Chapter 11 of her new book "Black Box Voting In the 21st Century" released early today in .PDF format at Blackboxvoting.com and here at Scoop Ms Harris observes.
((Bev Harris is a DUer for those of you who don't know))

"If you strip away the partisan rancor over the 2000 election, you are left with the undeniable fact that a presidential candidate conceded the election to his opponent based on a second card that mysteriously appears, subtracts 16,022 votes, then just as mysteriously disappears."

<snip>

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. It isn't all about D's and R's
especially in this confusing day in age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Unfortunately we will only have ourselves to blame if that happens

Newsom is Bush-lite through and through- right down to the compassionate conservatism that wants to put the homeless on a barge and hand everything over to the wealthy.

Instead of rushing to defend and stand by this grotesque facsimile of a Democrat, Gore and the others should have been demanding Newsom be replaced with a REAL Democrat.

The Democratic party has failed miserably on this one.

Gonzalez, by the way, if this means anything, is a Kucinich supporter who does not believe the Greens should run anyone if a Progressive Dem wins the Primaries.

He was a Progressive Dem until recently but the Dems pushed him out because he was too populist.

Sad times for the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Gonzalez supports Dennis, thanks I didnt know that
If he becomes mayor, we get something going with the mayor of a large California city. He also seems like a good guy. Now I dont talk about endorsing things like this but I will as I have planned to go with Gonzalez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because we're too smart to vote for a Republican
parading as a Democrat.

It's that simple.

DINOS OUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. DINOs Out Greens In -> 2.7%
Let's try a different tact, not all non-green Dem's are DINO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well...
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 01:16 AM by FDRrocks
I am not in San Francisco... but I know the area is liberal. And some liberals think the Democrats are liberal. Maybe that is why they vote for him.

Vote Gonzalez. Brown was bad and Republicans are worse... and the liberal can win. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I lived in SF
for twenty years and still have many friends there. The last thing the City by the Bay needs is a corporate lovin DINO.

Vote Gonzales!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outvoicer Donating Member (667 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because the Democrats are turning me off?
Newsom has lost my vote.

Gonzalez is so much more comfortable just being himself... and he truly represents progressives like myself.

i'm voting Green to send the Democratic Party a much-needed WAKE UP CALL!

Mayor Willie Brown disgusted me with his accusations of racism against Gonzalez.

Newsom's camps pissed me off with their fake "Green Party Anti-Gore" memo.

They aren't winning me over by being scummy and false, that's for darn sure.

When the local Democrats make me feel like they actually care about the issues I care about, and will actually do something about them...

I'll return to voting for them.

But nobody, Dem/Rep/Green/Lib/etc. automatically gets my votes just because.

Dems have gotta earn it... and they've gotta make some changes.

I'm sick of the status quo.

Gonzalez is my choice for mayor of SF and I am voting for him on Dec. 9th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Right friggin on dude...
If I wasn't planning to move to Canada I'd be right there with you. Voting for the person that best represents your view is the essence of Democracy... not voting for the lesser of two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Would someone please help me...
Why, specifically, is Newsom a Republican? What actions, votes, stands, allegiances make you call him an enemy?

I'm not challenging anyone. I honestly don't know why he is so detested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sorry, dude, you can vote for the Ken-doll-come-to-life.
I'll be voting for the better candidate, by far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Former Democrat Gonzalez had to become Green so that he could
stop faux-Democrats like Newsom from taking the reigns of power.

Gonzalez has the same heart he had when he was a registered Democrat. But that heart can now be in the body of a mayor because he went Green.

If he hadn't you'd be looking at mayor Newsom right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. That Gonzalez guy is a traitor
just like that pig in NYC Bloomberg.

He abandonded the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. How can you be serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. How many threads advertising a repub-lite do we need?
I mean, seriously, there's got to be at least three in GD right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Locking
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 01:21 AM by TahitiNut
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
TahitiNut - DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC