Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who exactly are the NeoCons?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:10 AM
Original message
Who exactly are the NeoCons?
Now the term "neocons" is thrown around an awful lot, but who are these people? Is this the Wolfie, Perle, Kristal crowd (I guess you could include some of the Christian fundies in this crowd as well)? How does their plan compare with the Rummy, Cheney, Rice, crowd?

The reason I split them up is because the former are in large part worried about the security of Israel. The latter has a lot of oil deals with the Saudis. Often don't these interests conflict? After all, we have people like Kissinger, Baker and Scowcroft who aren't NeoCons per say, but are every bit as corrupt as the other
group(s)...

How do the dynamics of these groups work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well
I think traditional conservatives are isolationalists themselves. They don't like the WTO, NAFTA, UN, etc., and also don't like get into wars. Pat Buchanan, Taki Theodoracopulos, and Scott McConnell are some of the "traditional" conservatives. They have a magazine called The American Conservative that was recently created to highlight the differences between the neo-conservatives and traditional conservatives.

Now why are the neo-conservatives so dangerous? Well, they also incorporate their disgust of the UN, but at the same time, are hellbent on empire. That means they aren't accountable to anyone except the people of the US.

I also think that traditional conservatives do not really care about the state of Israel. I know that Pat Buchanan feels that we should not be dealing with Israeli problems. Now, I am only using him as an example, but he does not encompass the entire traditional conservative movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a great special feature from csm
Names names, photos, great list of "Spheres of Influence" .. more ..

http://csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/index.html

Neocon 101

Don't know much about neoconservatism?
Learn basic concepts.

Interactive quiz
Are you a "neocon"?

Birth of a superpower
Timeline of key events in the history of US foreign policy.

In their own words
Remarks from leading figures.

Spheres of influence
Neocon think tanks, documents, and periodicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. quasi-fascists who herd around the philosophy of Leo Strauss
see this Jim Lobe article from the May 9, 2003, Asia Times:
Neocons dance a Strauss waltz

For some basic info see the links in my web site (in my sig line), especially the "U.S. Wars and Foreign Policy" page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. not well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. oh, man . . .
Pat Buchanan's great! I wish he was in the running!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Try This...........
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 06:28 AM by stewert
Start with the members of PNAC:

Project Directors

William Kristol, Chairman
Robert Kagan
Bruce P. Jackson
Lewis E. Lehrman
Mark Gerson
Randy Scheunemann

http://www.newamericancentury.org/aboutpnac.htm

Then look at who signs their letters:

Letter to Clinton in 1998 -

Elliott Abrams
Richard L. Armitage
William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner
John Bolton
Paula Dobriansky
Francis Fukuyama
Robert Kagan
Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol
Richard Perle
Peter W. Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld
William Schneider, Jr.
Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz
R. James Woolsey
Robert B. Zoellick

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

Look who signed this letter:

Second Statement on Post-War Iraq, March 28, 2003

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqstatement-032803.htm

Then add Dick Cheney too.

Try these too:

Gary Bauer
Max Boot
Frank Carlucci
Eliot Cohen
Midge Decter
Thomas Donnelly
Frank Gaffney
Daniel Goure
Bruce P. Jackson
Donald Kagan
Robert Kagan
Lewis E. Lehrman
Tod Lindberg
Rich Lowry
Daniel McKivergan
Joshua Muravchik
Danielle Pletka
Norman Podhoretz
Stephen P. Rosen
Gary Schmitt
Randy Scheunemann
William Schneider, Jr.
Richard Shultz
Henry Sokolski
Chris Williams
R. James Woolsey

http://www.newamericancentury.org/defense-20030123.htm

Forgot a Couple:

Jeb Bush
Steve Forbes
Dan Quayle

http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Here is a test
find out your foreign policy views

http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/quiz/neoconQuiz.html

Make sure you are not a neo-conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex88 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Neo-cons" are virtually all chickenhawks as well
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 06:46 AM by Alex88
and most of them are former Democrats who left the Party when it became anti-war in the early 1970's. Reagan then brought them in his administration because they were hawks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michael Harrington Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's an important facet of their identity...
Track down a copy of Sid Blumenthal's The Rise of the Counter Establishment and it'll tell you a great deal about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Liars, thugs and thieves
The bottom feeders.

Clinton haters to the core who thrive on war and bloodshed.

They should be banned, like asbestos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reachout Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. The term
"Neocon" gets misused more than just about any other political grouping. There are more neocons in the Republican Party, but there are a good number of neocons who name themselves Democrats. I even see neoconservative views expressed on this board on a fairly regular basis.

The original neocons were primarily far-left and Jewish (often Trotskyites). They followed Kristol in his journey from the far-left to the far-right. Younger neocons never made that journey and had their political awakening during the Reagan years, remaining staunchly in his ideological camp. People like Rumsfeld and Cheney are closely allied with the neocons, but they are not truly neocons themselves.


You probably have neoconservative leanings if you meet the following criteria:


- Socially liberal on many domestic issues

- Believe that the United States is primarily a force for good in the world

- Believe that as a force for good, it is the responsibility of the U.S. to spread democracy and freedom - through force if necessary

- Belive that the U.S. should not have its hands tied by multilateral institutions that prevent it from acting for the good of all

- Believe that Israel is a force for good in the Mideast and are unwavering in your support for it


I've encountered numerous people who are vitrolicly anti-Bush who hold most or all of the above positions. The argument seems to be more about the method of implementation than underpinning of the philosophy itself. Of course, some of these people are most upset with the paleocon elements of Bush and his administration such as Ashcroft who seek to limit their personal freedoms.

Neoconservative philosophy is the underlying force of American foreign policy at this point in history. Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton and Bush Jr. have all engaged in it, albeit with varying degrees. Regan, for example, talked tough but was less directly interventionist than Clinton and far less than Bush Jr. Aside from the presidency, the majority of Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, but into the basic tenets of the neocon worldview - at least on foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC