Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will any Supreme Court Justices retire next presidential term?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:19 PM
Original message
Will any Supreme Court Justices retire next presidential term?
I'm thinking some of them-right and left- are holding on to see who is elected in 2004.

We desperately need a Dem or else we will be getting right wingers that Daschle and Feinstein will vote to confirm the way they are voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. more like this presidential term
3 of them are likely to either this year or next
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. YES
Edited on Fri Dec-05-03 10:23 PM by La_Serpiente
I have no doubt in my mind that one of them will retire. We are long overdue for a retiree. If one of the conservative justices step down, then I wouldn't be that concerned. However, if Sandra Day O'Conner or a liberal justice stepped down, I would be going in panic attack mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. panic attack...
Stevens and O'Conner are both real possibilities.

Check out the ages -

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is unlikely
that anyone will retire right before the election... But it is possible. If Bush wins re-election, expect to see some of the republican justices go. Probably Rehnquist and/or O'conner sometime soon...

That is one of the reasons that we must win next year. The SC is due for some retirements; this court is the longest serving in the SC's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Up
I think this issue is important enough to be on the radar screen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. One or two may croak in the next five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-03 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's truly amazing is that
none of them has retired so far. Sandra Day O'Connor was supposed to have been quite irritated on election night 2000 when it looked like Gore would win, because she wanted to retire and of course wanted her replacement selected by a Republican president. I've not seen any comment or speculation anywhere as to why she's still happily chugging away as Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I hate to say this after her scandalous Bush V. Gore vote, but...
whoever reported that may have gotten it wrong. She may have been irritated about something else; about the closeness of the election, about the way it was being handled.... or something else entirely or

it might have been misreported entirely.

She would have quit by now if she really wanted to and * was her guy. The one thing she has always been whether I agree with her or not is tough minded and stubborn to a fault. (And sometimes that's been on our side - she's not entirely scary.)

It's some of the others that are far more worrying. (And just because they're not very, very old doesn't mean they couldn't die. Even people in the best of health sometimes die young....)

Politicat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, I long ago
came to the conclusion that the story of what she supposedly said probably wasn't true. But it's quite interesting that there's been almost no follow-up in the media, not even shortly after Bush was installed in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Or could it be that Sandy originally DID plan to retire when Junior was..
..selected, but then was actually appalled by his agenda? Some Republicans are, for one reason or another, opposed to all or part of what this Fraudministration has done.

She certainly didn't walk the party line on some of the more recent cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, she's pro-choice
and pro-gay rights, IIRC. Bush's expressed desire to curtail both might have been enough to bring out the stubborn mule in Justice O'Connor.

I think she realizes that if she retires now, Bush will appoint a pro-life, anti-gay rights justice... and whatever work she's done will be destroyed by Bush and a compliant court. I dunno...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC