Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld: Iraq war was to distract from failure in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 11:46 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld: Iraq war was to distract from failure in Afghanistan
I just found this Australian review of the Bob Woodward book "Bush at War". It has a quote from Rumsfeld:

Rumsfeld and Cheney emerge as the most rabid warmongers. The book quotes Rumsfeld quite early on in the Afghanistan war as asking: "look, as part of the war on terrorism, should we be getting something going in another area, other than Afghanistan, so that success or failure and progress isn't measured just by Afghanistan?"

http://www.cpa.org.au/garchve03/1123review.html

Now, there's no reason you'd start another war because you thought you were succeeding too much in Afghanistan, so he was really saying that Iraq should be invaded to distract from the possible (and, as it turned out, real, since bin Laden was never captured, only Kabul came under 'coalition' control, and the Taliban are making a comeback) failure in Afghanistan.

I know we have thought things like this, but I've never heard it admitted by the administration before (and I can't see the quote used anywhere else on the Net).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. He couldn't be THAT lolo but then arrogance does strange things
Or is he over the top? like a closet lolo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it was more like
"Shouldn't we go somewhere else first, like Afghanistan, so we can call it the war on terrorism?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, let's see now...
We invaded Iraq because:

1) they had weapons of mass destruction
2) Saddam was a threat to the US, so we had to take him out
3) Iraq has the world's #2 supply of oil, and we need it
4) This was the PNAC's first stop in a string of countries to invade
5) The US wants to control the Middle East
6) The war merchants wanted this
7) this was a good move for corporate interests
8) Saddam wouldn't let the inspectors in, so we had to take him out
9) Saddam threatened King George I, so we had to take him out
10) by invading Iraq, the other countries will comply

And now they're saying that they invaded Iraq because Afghanistan was a miserable failure?

Why can't they get their facts straight? I'm sick of all the double-talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. BWWWAaahahahahahahah LOL
Just luv the way you put it
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right. It looks like their successes or FAILURES
Edited on Sat Dec-06-03 12:49 PM by rock
will be many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC