Do you HATE Nader??

[CalebHayes]

I Hate Nader!!!!! I hate that guy!!! I hate him... I hate him... I hate him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Renew Deal]

1. Oh boy, here we go.

Get your flame throwers.

[JohnKleeb]

3. I'll take one

[kiahzero]

5. I want one! (n/t)

[kiahzero]

2. No

I think his run in 2000 was poorly considered, and his apparent run in 04 even moreso.

[KG]

4. well,

how eloquent.

[JailBush]

6. I voted for Nader in 2000. Now I hate him...

but not for any of the stupid reasons advanced by Democrats. I had to investigate him myself. I finally found evidence that convinced me he's an operative. I hate Al Gore as much as I hate Nader, though I hate George W. Bush more than either of them.

Moral of the story: If Democrats had a clue about public education, they could have advanced a SOLID REASON to not vote for Nader, rather than simply say, "He lives in a nice house!"

[kiahzero]

12. Here's your reason.

Moral of the story: If Democrats had a clue about public education, they could have advanced a SOLID REASON to not vote for Nader, rather than simply say, "He lives in a nice house!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duvergers+Law">Duverger's Law.

[Terwilliger]

7. oh yes

he is the anti-christ

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

8. Welcome to DU

but this is nothing more than flame bait

[GregorStocks]

9. Nope.

I don't HATE Nader. I just wish he would stop taking votes away from KUCINICH!!! WOO!!! (you know he will! Well, if Kucinich wins the primary)

[_NorCal_D_]

10. Good point

B-) Welcome to DU! :hi:

[JohnKleeb]

11. No but I hate this guy

http://www.nrc.nl/images/bush,7.jpg

[mdguss]

13. Yes:

I think he is a hypocritical mole of the right, and a TRUE sell out. Bush is bad, but the people like Ralph who make money off of him are worse.

[JohnKleeb]

14. Last I saw it wasnt Nader conducting this war

BTW I did support Gore in 2000, still would have but I consider Bush far worse than Nader.

[Moderator]

15. Locking

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator