INTELLIGENT CHOICE
by Spencer Ackerman
Candidate: John Kerry
Category: Domestic Policy
Grade: A One of the best national security proposals contained within John Kerry's speech today at the Council on Foreign Relations is destined to be ignored. Coverage of the speech will surely focus on what Kerry has to say about Iraq or rebuilding U.S. alliances or how he sticks it to President Bush. That's fine as far as it goes, but Kerry's brief remarks on intelligence reform have a lot going for them. "We must end ... the bureaucratic rivalries that put institutional pride ahead of national safety," he said. "As President, I will address this danger immediately by asking Congress to pass legislation creating a Director of National Intelligence, with real control of all national intelligence personnel and budgets."
Not the sexiest offering, to be sure, but a long overdue one. As it stands now, the various agencies within the intelligence community are nominally overseen by the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)--that is, the head of the CIA. But 85 percent of the intelligence community's budget is in the hands of the Pentagon and outside the direction of the DCI. So the person who's in charge of all of these different agencies only controls about 15 percent of their funding. And since that person is only directly in charge of one of these agencies, the CIA, the DCI tends to put the needs of Langley ahead of those of the community as a whole. This breeds balkanization within the community, leading to cases where, in 1998, the CIA declared a clandestine war on Osama bin Laden and the other intelligence services knew nothing about it. Such intelligence failures make policymakers contemptuous of the intelligence agencies, leading them to marginalize, second-guess, or even place political pressure on analysts--as with Iraq.
Creating a Director of National Intelligence will structure the sprawling intelligence community in a top-down function, the same way we organize every other aspect of the bureaucracy. It's not a panacea, but it will certainly introduce vastly more accountability into intelligence production than we have now. Since the war on terrorism can't be won without robust intelligence capabilities, intelligence reform is imperative. Kerry's recognition of this fact says a lot about his commitment to winning that war.
http://www.tnr.com/primary/index.mhtml?pid=1033<
>