Arnold and company being sued.

[warrior1]

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/millercomp1.html

DECEMBER 8--A Los Angeles woman who came forward during the California gubernatorial campaign to accuse Arnold Schwarzenegger of previous instances of sexual harassment today sued the Hollywood star, claiming that he, an aide, and his campaign smeared her as a convicted felon when she made her charges. In the below Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, former stuntwoman Rhonda Miller charges that the Schwarzenegger camp told reporters that she had an extensive rap sheet, a dirty trick meant to discount her credibility when it came to the harassment charges. Miller claims that the Schwarzenegger smear began an hour after she made her charges public, with campaign spokesman Sean Walsh sending journalists an e-mail directing them to the Superior Court's web site, where they could access Miller's lengthy criminal history. The felon in question, however, was a different Rhonda Miller. (8 pages)

[Onward]

1. Good for Her!

Go Rhonda!

[Zeke]

3. Hmmm.

Yuh know, I'm a licensed private investigator, and I LOL when Arnie said he'd hire PI to investigate himself RE the groping allegations.

What person hires a PI to investigate themselves?

Hey, why doesn't Arnie secretly tape record himself and see if he says anything comprimising, as well?

What an asshole!

[Catherine Vincent]

4. "What person hires a PI to investigate themselves?"

George Dumbass Bush!

[newyorican]

5. The guilty kind.

:smoke:

[opihimoimoi]

2. Oh My, Now what, Arnie??

Apologize???

Too little

Too late!!!!

We all know the answer, "Buy the bitch out"

Whats $86,000,000.75?

When one goes Neg, there is a price to pay.

When the Nation goes Neg, the price gets stiffer.

The Pubs are the most Neg, like the Brits would say,

"A SHOWER OF BASTARDS"

[AP]

6. Often, it's not the origingal bad act that gets you in trouble...it's...

... the coverup.

[warrior1]

7. any chance

that an conviction will start the ball rolling towards removing him from office?

[AP]

8. No convictions for civil offenses. Civil liability, however, would not...

...look good.

However, he'd probably settle and insist on a confidentiality agreement, so it wouldn't be worth that much in terms of political damage.